Tags

, , , , , , ,

Norm’s Comment:

Is it the “New World Order” or “Capitalism?”  To my mind, “Capitalism” has always been ‘monopolistic.’  From its inception, it has always been anchored in ‘state power.’  The ‘bourgeoisie’ was never a coterie of democratically minded ‘small shop keepers.’  The ‘bourgeois’ revolution, the transition from feudalism to capitalism, was a project of the already fabulously rich for the fabulously rich organized on the grandest of scales.  And so it continues.  It is a mistake to assume that what we are witnessing today is a corruption of a social order that was once more benign and progressive in its intents.  Listening to Michel Chossudovsky, a person like Karl Marx would recognize the current pattern of world upheaval as a historical continuation of the ‘capitalist project of accumulation,’ which when it resorts to the cruder methods of warfare, he called “primitive accumulation.”

Yes, as Chossudovsky puts it, it is all part of ‘Global Capitalism.’

See, for example, the following chapters (source: Marxist Internet Archive) from Capital: Volume One — Part VIII: The So-Called Primitive Accumulation:

Chapter XXVI The Secret of Primitive Accumulation
Chapter XXVII Expropriation of the Agricultural Population from the Land
Chapter XXVIII Bloody Legislation Against the Expropriated, from the End of the 15th Century. Forcing down of Wages by Acts of Parliament
Chapter XIX Genesis of the Capitalist Farmer
Chapter XXX Reaction of the Agricultural Revolution on Industry. Creation of the Home Market for Industrial Capital
Chapter XXXI Genesis of the Industrial Capitalist
Chapter XXXII Historical Tendency of Capitalist Accumulation
Chapter XXXIII The Modern Theory of Colonisation