big data, corruption in science, genetic engineering, institutional corruption, liability exemptions, Logistics companies, PCR test, profits, systematic hiding of side effects, The new mRNA "vaccine", therapy without a diagnosis, vaccination craze, Wolfgang Wodarg
[Norm’s note: the following article has been ‘machine’ or ‘auto-magically’ translated from German into English and, therefore, may not be idiomatically perfect. And related to this article, also by the same author: “False flag genetic engineering on humans: The vaccine industry and politics want to change us genetically because of Covid-19,” by Wolfgang Wodarg, June 12, 2020. You can find it on this page if you scroll down.]
The real plague
The corruption in science and politics is fueling a vaccination craze that will harm many and bring only a few profits.
Friday, November 6th, 2020, 5:00 p.m.
~ 12 minutes reading time
Vaccination has always been a fear business. Where else can you pump substances on this scale into the bodies of healthy people? To create fear, however, one needs danger. And if the real danger doesn’t seem big enough to have the desired effect, you just have to hold a magnifying glass over it with the help of the media. Many politicians have long since become advertising media for the vaccination industry. Why are you participating in this game? There is an ugly but unfortunately apt word for this: corruption. As a medical doctor, former member of parliament and volunteer anti-corruption fighter, Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg is ideally suited to help immunize the public against organized farmer trapping. Perhaps that is one of the reasons why many would like to make him public enemy no. 1.
It’s always the same trick: an illness is magnified under the media magnifying glass and presented as the most terrible danger possible. The media like that. With such an agenda setting, most people notice for the first time that the supposedly dangerous disease actually exists. It used to be different with epidemics. Corrupt politicians and scientists do the rest. And of course, when the fear is great enough, governments have to react. So far, in the case of “pandemics”, they have only ever financed and bought vaccines and done advertising for vaccinations. Now they are even helping to organize the fear of the “epidemic” themselves.
There are also enough white coats that always give up for it. After all, popularity and research grants attract. The red lights for doctors and patients should come on now at the latest when the Chancellor tries to enforce immature genetic “mass vaccinations” after the PCR tests that are not approved for diagnoses and are unsuitable. It plans this under the absurd guise of an epidemiological emergency on a national scale, across the board and bypassing the treating doctors.
Well-known fear makers as pioneers of big business
The common panic-mongering of Drosten, Lauterbach, Söder or Merkel lacks any medical-scientific basis. Lauterbach is now running amok again with an embarrassingly bad study , branded “Imperial College”. This panic factory has already conjured up the most outrageous fear scenarios from their computers with the help of the notorious Neil Ferguson with bird and swine flu. Now Covid-19 is supposed to reduce our intellectual performance in the long term. Does the political madness have anything to do with it?
There are more reliable guides – also in the RKI
As for many years, I prefer to stick to the clean epidemiologists of the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), who are reporting to us right now, at the end of October 2020, during the test tsunami and before the second lockdown:
“In the National Reference Center (NRZ) for influenza viruses, only rhinoviruses were identified in a total of eleven (39 percent) of the 28 sentinel samples in week 43, 2020. Influenza viruses or SARS-CoV-2 were not identified in any of the sentinel samples examined. Due to the small number of samples sent in, a robust assessment of the viruses that may currently still be circulating is not possible. “
Since virus samples are usually taken thousands of times in flu waves from people with respiratory diseases, one wonders: Why are so few regular samples taken now? Isn’t anyone sick anymore?
Vaccination for wrong diagnoses?
The drifting apart of high PCR test numbers with the correspondingly higher false positive test results on the one hand and official documentation of a mild autumn season on the other hand proves, even for medical laypersons, that the PCR test says nothing about clinical findings, infections or infectivity. It is completely unsuitable and misleading as a yardstick for decisions about measures under the Infection Protection Act (IfSG).
“Close your eyes and through” seems the watchword
But politics is currently not giving a damn about evidence-based medicine, and the National Ethics Councils and Vaccination Commissions apparently no longer ask about the indication of measures, but argue about prioritization, according to the motto: who will be able to benefit from the new “vaccines” first who unfortunately has to wait. The so-called Covid-19 vaccination can be the most harmful of these measures. It is already financed from our contributions and taxes and is in reality a comprehensive, giant observational study with novel genetic manipulations of our immune systems.
False flag genetic engineering
What around 200 companies and consortia around the world are currently researching and wanting to market as quickly as possible are, to a large extent, new and high-risk genetic engineering interventions in the complex biological communication processes of our immune system. Interventions that should be carried out on healthy people in a previously never attempted extent. During the swine flu excitement and in the middle of the upcoming federal election campaign in 2009, the vaccine lobby, with the help of its popular representatives, had the use of recombinant nucleic acids in humans as a “vaccination” hidden in the Medicines Act. This happened in the last meeting before the summer recess for the election campaign without any debate and was secretly put on record.
The companies and their political lobby are trying to gloss over us by saying that it is a normal vaccination. Salvation from the threatening burden of a deadly pandemic would only be possible if as many people as possible allowed themselves to be “vaccinated”. Only when a vaccination is available for everyone will the pandemic be ended, announced Ms. von der Leyen at her “donation conference” in chorus with the heads of government from almost all of Europe in spring 2020.
Zero risk and high profits
AstraZeneca, BioNTech / Pfizer, Sanofi / GSK, Merck / University of Oxford, CureVac, Biologika, CEVEC, ARTES, Vibalogics / Janssen, Moderna / NIAID, Novavax and others are in the starting blocks and are about to do the funded “telescoped” studies as little as possible To conclude scandals without attracting attention as part of a “rolling” approval. You can let it roll in a relatively relaxed manner, because with the promised exemptions from liability, tax subsidies in the billions and the purchase guarantees for hundreds of thousands of vaccination doses, you have your business practically in your pocket.
It was similar with the swine flu. Even the more than 20 million vaccine doses adulterated with active amplifiers, which we were spared from swine flu by critical specialists, family doctors and paediatricians, had already been paid for. They could safely be disposed of and still brought Glaxo and competitors carefree returns in the billions around the world.
SARS-CoV-2: How many new viruses are there?
Allegedly, a Vector “vaccine” from AstraZeneca and an mRNA “vaccine” from BioNTech / Pfizer with their genetic engineering molecules are on the verge of turning millions of people into corona-resistant genetically modified organisms (GMOs). We actually don’t really know which coronaviruses we have to fight against, because similar to how we know it from influenza viruses, coronaviruses are also constantly changing many of their gene segments. The original “SARS” coronaviruses from Wuhan have long been undetectable. Hundreds of other Wuhan variants have now been distributed, found and sequenced. And what you can find now mainly are only positive PCR tests, which are known to react with a wide variety of corona variants.
Vaccination centers are to replace the doctor’s offices
In the last week of October, the Federal Minister of Health called on the federal states to prepare the establishment of a total of around 60 vaccination centers throughout Germany and to report the delivery addresses for vaccines by November 10, 2020. The health authorities should participate in this. But the retrofitting of congress or concert halls, which are currently closed anyway, is also being considered ( Tagesschau from October 23, 2020).
For the first time, normal vaccination operations are largely being relocated from doctors’ practices to facilities that – like PCR tests – are mainly operated by large private laboratories and service providers.
As a justification for bypassing the increasingly critical medical profession, technical features of some of the newer procedures are presented. The new mRNA “vaccine” must be stored and transported frozen at -20 or below -80 degrees Celsius. If it is prepared for injection, it should not be kept in the refrigerator for more than a few hours. According to information from the industry, this is necessary because in the short development time it is not possible to develop a process that also guarantees stability at normal refrigerator temperatures.
Logistics companies also benefit
The big players in the logistics industry such as DHL, Fedex and UPS are rubbing their hands together and are apparently already preparing for a huge deal with cool logistics with a lot of government support. Handelsblatt and Deutsche Welle reported that the companies are building several large cold stores as close as possible to airports, in which there are supposed to be hundreds of large freezers, each of which can hold tens of thousands of vaccine doses. The manufacturers of such refrigerators – the Handelsblatt mentions the Swabian company Binder from Tuttlingen, for example – are among the war profiteers in this war against test results. So there are many for whom this madness also promises good business.
It would be more uncomplicated and cheaper, because alternatively, of course, it would also be possible to use a conventional updated corona antigen component in the annual influenza vaccination mixture. However, it has not yet been shown that this would somehow significantly defuse the annual flu waves. Also, with such a common vaccination campaign, neither big business nor a political “reset” could be staged or justified.
Goodbye vaccination advice and individual indications!
The alleged technical overstrain of some very influential vaccine manufacturers is now intended to ensure that an otherwise always required medical-individual vaccination advice is no longer taken so seriously. I consider the reasoning to be an advanced argument. For decades, sensitive vaccines have been stored centrally and applied decentrally. Some blood products or vaccines have already been delivered to doctors’ practices through cold chains with dry ice and can be used there professionally. In practices, this is mainly a question of scheduling and practice logistics.
Especially with the planned new interventions in the processes of the immune system, anamnestic knowledge and individual medical vaccination advice are more necessary than ever. Because there is a risk of a myriad of individually different complications and side effects. It would be gross negligence – even if made legally possible by emergency ordinances – to have the interventions carried out by auxiliary staff who are remote from the patient in mass actions.
Rolling approval and systematic hiding of side effects
The inevitably higher risk for “vaccinated people” with the granted “rolling” approvals for vaccines is supposedly compensated for by the fact that the companies have to carry out observational studies, observational studies or post-marketing studies. It is about the vigilant observation of possible adverse effects of drugs, in technical jargon: pharmacovigilance.
But what to think of the type of pharmacovigilance now envisaged, we in the health working group at Transparency International investigated and denounced years ago. In the case of the genetic modifications now planned for millions of healthy people in the shortest possible time, such a procedure is more than grossly negligent. If only one in a thousand vaccinated people had a serious side effect, it would mean tens of thousands of autoimmune diseases, paralysis or even deaths in Germany. Much more damage than any “pandemic” in the last twenty years has been able to cause.
In the case of mass vaccinations in chicken or pig fattening facilities, the follow-up period lasts for obvious reasons at most until the planned slaughter date. So only weeks or months. The virologists and epidemiologists from veterinary medicine should be called on: people are not cattle for slaughter and want to live long and stay healthy without harmful drug side effects. But in human medicine too, the pharmaceutical industry minimizes its interest in late effects for business reasons. Therefore, there is very little knowledge about this type of vaccination that occurs later. Greetings from Contergan.
In the case of genetic modifications, cross-generational effects via the germline cannot categorically be ruled out, but should be part of technology impact assessments and pharmacovigilance. In the health committee of the Bundestag, I vehemently but in vain resisted the fact that the monitoring, recording and evaluation of drug side effects are in the hands of the same authorities that approve the drugs for marketing. Unfortunately, this is still the case.
Of course, the pharmaceutical industry would prefer to carry out this monitoring on its own responsibility, as “voluntary self-regulation”. Because of the relaxation of data protection by the current Minister of Health and because of his close cooperation with the data economy and the pharmaceutical and vaccine industry, we are no longer far from such a hostile assumption of public tasks.
The fear of an epidemic as a harvest helper for big data
The big data companies are rubbing their hands anyway, because for them the “pandemic” came just as requested. After a few favors from the Minister of Health in the previous year – digital vaccination card, electronic patient file, implant register, gematik takeover etc. Even symptoms that have occurred should be collected centrally in the future. Since something like this is overwhelming for the state administration, the big data companies are not only happy about state contracts, but also have our most intimate health data in their computers. Data protection is of course guaranteed.
We are slowly becoming a transparent society. Under the pretext of medical research or health monitoring, our health data is now collected more and more completely from cradle to grave. In the case of Covid-19, allegedly for the prophylactic analysis and research and improvement of new vaccines.
But what do Google, Apple, Amazon, Microsoft, SAP, Avarto / Bertelsmann and others care about our health? They need our data as the “gold of the future” for their business, because primarily they don’t have to supply us, but their shareholders. These are legitimate self-interests, but it is not legitimate for a lobbyist in the ministerial office to abuse his public office to feed the economy with our health data through hectic data laws and emergency regulations. What’s in it for him? Can you examine that? Corruption and abuse of office were previously open to criminal prosecution in Germany.
No good therapy without a clear diagnosis
The best way to tell whether something is dangerous is by the damage it causes. It is important to recognize this in good time and to observe it precisely, systematically and prospectively. For example, through sentinels, as the RKI operates or as a responsible medical officer from Bavaria and others suggest. More and more often, clinicians in several countries are also coming out of cover and asking about the allegedly so many Covid 19 sufferers. Nobody doubts that there will be patients with respiratory diseases this year too, with new viruses and with severe courses. And that the PCR test can also be positive for these. Except that we have tons of sick people who overfill the hospital beds because of a new coronavirus, that’s obviously wrong.
I have also just received the following angry email about the situation in the outpatient clinics of the statutory health insurance physicians:
“At first there was not a cent for the tests, and many colleagues – almost all of them in our region – hardly tested at all. Now we get more money for a test – duration: 1 minute – for healthy people (15 euros) than for a complete abdominal sonography for an acute abdomen (15 minutes for 12 euros). That’s why all of a sudden testing is taking place everywhere. “
Here, too, you can see that the viruses are not the problem.
The real plague is institutional corruption
In my previous work as a doctor, as a member of parliament and as a voluntary anti-corruption fighter, I have enough examples for the big players in the agricultural industry, the energy industry, the private armaments and “security” industry, the media world and, of course, especially the pharmaceutical and vaccine industry large-scale scientific fraud, fictitious catastrophes, bought analyzes and fact checkers, secret lobby strategies, psyoping, astroturfing, professional troublemakers, provocateurs or shitstormers. Since the simple bribery of civil servants has given way more and more to the private assumption of entire offices and public institutions, the matter is legally very complicated. A lot of money is needed both for paid lobbying and agenda setting and for lawyers in defense of this.
Some have a lot of it and some cannot afford it. What we are now experiencing is the result of this socially desolate imbalance. It doesn’t help if a few billionaires think they can buy (sell) the salvation of the world. Whatever such salvation may be in the minds of self-appointed philanthropists, it can only result in violence and oppression. How many times have we believed that we have overcome these archaic autocratic patterns through human rights, democracy and the rule of law? Unfortunately, there is still no vaccination against corruption.