Open Letter to RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki




You can read and sign the letter ====>HERE<====

Hat tip: Dar S.


As Canadians, our constitutionally-protected freedoms precede the government, and may only be temporarily limited if the majority of evidence justifies such infringements as reasonable, provable, and guided by law. If presented with all available evidence in a court, we firmly believe the government implemented mandates would not hold up under scrutiny.

As experienced investigators, we look past what information is provided and focus on how the information is presented. A proper investigation should be conducted as objectively as possible, and follow the principle that it is better to have questions that cannot be answered than to have answers that cannot be questioned. A complete investigation must include full disclosure of all the facts of the case, even contradictory evidence. Why, then, is there little to no tolerance for free and open debate on this matter? Many credible medical and scientific experts are being censored. Accordingly, we rightly have concerns about “the science” we are being coerced to “follow”.

As representatives of our communities within the RCMP and representatives of the RCMP in our communities, we have never witnessed such division in our country. This sense of “Us versus Them” will be further fueled by having a police force consisting only of “vaccinated” people, while serving communities consisting of “unvaccinated” people, which goes against the community policing model the RCMP has strived to achieve.

As law enforcement officers, we already face higher levels of stress and mental illnesses due to the nature of our work. These have been compounded – considerably – by mandates that we believe are deeply unethical, threatening our livelihood, and dividing society.

As federal employees, what is being done to mitigate this stress? Moreover, what assurances are we given that the injections will not cause short or long-term side effects? What steps will be taken to ensure members are compensated for adverse side effects?

Police officers are expected to preserve the peace, uphold the law, and defend the public interest. We strongly believe that forced and coerced medical treatments undermine all three and, thus, contradict our duties and responsibilities to Canadians. We remain loyal to the Charter and Bill of Rights and ask you to send investigators to collect statements from medical professionals (and other reliable witnesses) who allege they have been silenced – putting lives at risk. Allow us to make this information publicly available to all so the public can scrutinize it and achieve informed consent.


This letter was created from the collective thoughts, beliefs, and opinions of actively serving police officers of the Royal Canadian Mounted Police (RCMP) from across the country. We have a wealth of experience which includes, but is not limited to, General Duty, Federal Serious and Organized Crime, School Liaison, Prime Minister Protection Detail, Emergency Response Team, Media Relations, and Combined Forces Special Enforcement Unit. We come from various ranks, levels of experience, communities, cultural backgrounds, religious beliefs, and vaccination statuses. Together we are the Mounties for Freedom. We are individual police officers who united in the belief that citizens, including federal employees, should not be forced and coerced into taking a medical intervention.

Source: Mounties For Freedom: Open Letter to RCMP Commissioner Brenda Lucki

Another censored study, but luckily, as Mathew Crawford put it, “The Wayback Machine seems to have caught a glimpse . . .”



, , , , ,

Update: 21 Oct 2021 — You can listen to Trish Wood’s interview, concerning the quashing of the study at hand, with Dr. Jessica Rose and Dr. Peter McCullough ===>HERE<===. The actual interview begins at the 32 minute time stamp, although not to suggest that the initial part of the podcast isn’t also worth your time, but if you are pressed for time, you want to be aware of that . . .

Norm’s note: this just in — so, was this study censored or not? According to this Tweet by Trish Wood, it does appear so:

Source: The Wayback Machine

Hat tip: Mathew Crawford

A Report on Myocarditis Adverse Events in the U.S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) in Association with COVID-19 Injectable Biological Products

Jessica Rose PhD, MSc, BSc 1, Peter A. McCullough MD, MPH 1

Get rights and content

Under a Creative Commons license open access


Following the global rollout and administration of the Pfizer Inc./BioNTech BNT162b2 and Moderna mRNA-1273 vaccines on December 17, 2020, in the United States, and of the Janssen Ad26.COV2.S product on April 1st, 2021, in an unprecedented manner, hundreds of thousands of individuals have reported adverse events (AEs) using the Vaccine Adverse Events Reports System (VAERS). We used VAERS data to examine cardiac AEs, primarily myocarditis, reported following injection of the first or second dose of the COVID-19 injectable products. Myocarditis rates reported in VAERS were significantly higher in youths between the ages of 13 to 23 (p<0.0001) with ∼80% occurring in males. Within 8 weeks of the public offering of COVID-19 products to the 12-15-year-old age group, we found 19 times the expected number of myocarditis cases in the vaccination volunteers over background myocarditis rates for this age group. In addition, a 5-fold increase in myocarditis rate was observed subsequent to dose 2 as opposed to dose 1 in 15-year-old males. A total of 67% of all cases occurred with BNT162b2. Of the total myocarditis AE reports, 6 individuals died (1.1%) and of these, 2 were under 20 years of age – 1 was 13. These findings suggest a markedly higher risk for myocarditis subsequent to COVID-19 injectable product use than for other known vaccines, and this is well above known background rates for myocarditis. COVID-19 injectable products are novel and have a genetic, pathogenic mechanism of action causing uncontrolled expression of SARS-CoV-2 spike protein within human cells. When you combine this fact with the temporal relationship of AE occurrence and reporting, biological plausibility of cause and effect, and the fact that these data are internally and externally consistent with emerging sources of clinical data, it supports a conclusion that the COVID-19 biological products are deterministic for the myocarditis cases observed after injection.


SARS-CoV-2; COVID-19; myocarditis; VAERS; adverse events (AEs); COVID-19-Injection-Related Myocarditis (CIRM)


Myocarditis is inflammation of the myocardium or ‘musculature’ of the heart. [1,2,3,4] The myocardium is made up of many cell types however the greatest mass of tissue is accounted for by cardiomyocytes. [4,5,6] Cardiomyocytes are the principal contractile cells and are supported by specialized conduction and stromal cell types. [4,5,6,7,8] Both systole and diastole are active processes that expend energetic resources of cardiomyocytes which are organized into myofibrils. [8,9,10] Myocarditis can manifest as sudden death, chest pain or heart failure. The symptoms of heart failure from myocarditis include effort intolerance, dyspnea, fatigue, and ankle swelling. [1,2,3,4,6,11,12,13]  The cause is an inflammation of the heart muscle, often following a viral infection, but not exclusively so. The damaged muscle is prone to lethal cardiac arrythmias as well as having the potential to develop both right and left ventricular dysfunction (cardiomyopathy). [3,4,12,13]

Myocarditis is a major risk for cardiac death among the young. [11] The high-risk age population for myocarditis is from puberty through early 30s, and it is the third leading cause of sudden cardiac death in children and young adults. 1 per 100,000 children per year are affected by myocarditis and it has been reported that 0.05% of all pediatric hospitalizations are for myocarditis. Between 0.5 and 3.5% of heart failure hospitalizations are due to myocarditis. Most cases of myocarditis are identified in young adults with males affected more often than females. [12,13,14,15,16]

In the context of COVID-19 respiratory illness, there are a significant number of patients who are otherwise healthy experiencing heart-related complications, including myocarditis, but the majority of clinical reports and diagnoses claim cardiac injury based on ICU-related-related injury to the heart. [17,18,19,20,21,22,23,24,25] This is relevant in terms of contextualizing the potential risk of myocarditis from the COVID-19 products against COVID-19 itself and establishing a background rate of myocarditis in specific contexts. Cardiac injuries associated with COVID-19 respiratory illness reveal a set of parameters based on a combination of measurements of troponin levels, electrocardiogram (ECG/EKG), echocardiogram readings, cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and clinical symptoms that are different from the clinical picture of vaccine-induced myocarditis. COVID-19-Injection-Related Myocarditis (CIRM) can be defined as the onset of clinical myocarditis that is temporally associated with COVID-19 mRNA or adenoviral DNA vaccine administration and in the absence of another known cause. CIRM presents with clinical symptoms (chest pain, effort intolerance) combined with excessively elevated troponin levels, EKG changes (diffuse ST segment elevation) and in some cases left and right ventricular dysfunction on echocardiography. In cases where the echocardiogram is unrevealing, cardiac MRI can detect changes in tissue characterization consistent with myocardial inflammation. [22,23,24,25,26,27]

The Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) was created and implemented in 1990 by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) to receive reports about adverse events that may be associated with vaccines. [28] The primary purpose for maintaining the database is to serve as an early warning or signaling system for adverse events not detected during pre-market testing. In addition, the National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 (NCVIA) requires health care providers and vaccine manufacturers to report to the DHHS specific adverse events following the administration of those vaccines outlined in the Act.1 Under-reporting is a known and serious disadvantage of the VAERS system. [28,29,30]

An Adverse Event (AE) is defined as any untoward or unfavorable medical occurrence in a human study participant, including any abnormal physical exam or laboratory finding, symptom, or disease, temporally associated with the participants’ involvement in the research, whether or not considered related to participation in the research. A serious or severe adverse event (SAE) is defined as any adverse event that results in death, is life threatening, or places the participant at immediate risk of death from the event as it occurred, requires, or prolongs hospitalization, causes persistent or significant disability or incapacity, results in congenital anomalies or birth defects or is another condition which investigators judge to represent significant hazards. [28,30,31] These classifications are based on the Code of Federal Regulations. The VAERS handbook states that approximately 15% of reported AEs are classified as severe. [28] Myocarditis qualifies as an SAE as it is often associated with hospitalization.

The BNT162b2, mRNA-1273, Ad26.COV2.S products have not been approved or licensed by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), having been authorized instead for emergency use by FDA under an Emergency Use Authorization (EUA) to prevent Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) for use in individuals 16 years of age and older.2[32,33,34] Ultimately, the roll-out of COVID-19 injectable biologicals are actively being monitored, but all of the risks are not yet known. [16,17,31,32,33,34,35,36,37,38,39,40,41,42,43,44,45,46]

Continue reading


On account of a security conern . . .


Apologies for taking the site down, but something came up that struck me as possibly concerning, and it may yet be an issue. Consequently, I preemptively obliterated the site, and will slowly recover what I can in terms of posts over the coming weeks. It will take some time, however, since I’ll be away most days over the next month or so. I don’t think it was anything malicious but something that I myself may have done inadvertently. I hope not to have inconvenienced too may people in terms of links and references. On the other hand, if the issue crops up again, I may have to scrap this site entirely and start over again. We shall see.



Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19? — Ronald N. Kostoff et al. | ScienceDirect



, , , , , , ,

Source: ScienceDirect

Get rights and content

Under a Creative Commons license

View as PDF

Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19?

Ronald N.Kostoff, DanielaCalina, DarjaKanduc, Michael B.Briggs, PanayiotisVlachoyiannopoulos, Andrey A.Svistunov, AristidisTsatsakis


Bulk of COVID-19 per capita deaths occur in elderly with high comorbidities.
Per capita COVID-19 deaths are negligible in children.
Clinical trials for these inoculations were very short-term.
Clinical trials did not address long-term effects most relevant to children.
High post-inoculation deaths reported in VAERS (very short-term).


This article examines issues related to COVID-19 inoculations for children. The bulk of the official COVID-19-attributed deaths per capita occur in the elderly with high comorbidities, and the COVID-19 attributed deaths per capita are negligible in children. The bulk of the normalized post-inoculation deaths also occur in the elderly with high comorbidities, while the normalized post-inoculation deaths are small, but not negligible, in children. Clinical trials for these inoculations were very short-term (a few months), had samples not representative of the total population, and for adolescents/children, had poor predictive power because of their small size. Further, the clinical trials did not address changes in biomarkers that could serve as early warning indicators of elevated predisposition to serious diseases. Most importantly, the clinical trials did not address long-term effects that, if serious, would be borne by children/adolescents for potentially decades.

A novel best-case scenario cost-benefit analysis showed very conservatively that there are five times the number of deaths attributable to each inoculation vs those attributable to COVID-19 in the most vulnerable 65+ demographic. The risk of death from COVID-19 decreases drastically as age decreases, and the longer-term effects of the inoculations on lower age groups will increase their risk-benefit ratio, perhaps substantially.

Continue reading

Illa: The PCR Disaster. Genesis and Evolution of the »Drosten Test«



, , , , , , , , ,

Source: Verlag Thomas Kubo

It all started in the last century, with an ingenious idea and a record sum for a patent. In order for this investment to pay off many times over, the problem to solve was sought and found, among other things, in clinical virology.

This book traces the origins of the PCR test, which is now used worldwide, a test that also decides on fundamental rights restrictions worldwide. The author Illa uncovers the origins of the PCR test, names actors and profiteers and, with the help of original sources, proves that the establishment of the PCR test as the “gold standard” for identifying corona infections was anything but accidental.

The suitability of the PCR test is more than questionable. However, the fact that PCR cannot distinguish between a complete genome and fragments, between the ability and inability to replicate and therefore inevitably produces false-positive results in the context of an infectious disease is of no interest to a pharmaceutical giant when billions upon billions are at stake.

As long as PCR is used as senselessly as it is now, there will be no end to this situation, be it with this or any other virus. The well-established team is making an excellent living out of it and will continue to do so as long as they are allowed to. It also has an immense amount to lose if it becomes apparent what is being done to the PCR and to us.

With a contribution by Prof Ulrike Kämmerer

100 pp, 140 × 210 mm
ISBN: 978-3-96230-017-3 (PDF)
ISBN: 978-3-96230-018-0 (Softcover)

Appeared in April 2021 (PDF). Information on the softcover edition will be given shortly.

The PDF of the booklet can be downloaded for free.

Corona documents, edited by Artur Aschmoneit – Volume I

In cooperation with

Publisher’s Note as PDF





, , , , , , , , , , , ,

Hat tip: SavageRose62 (Also worth the read, of course, the piece which prompted SavageRose62’s mention of the video at hand: Estimating Vaccine-Induced Mortality, Part III: Q&A and the Million Dollar Bounty, by Mathew Crawford, only published today, 8/12/2021)

Source of the video: Bit Chute

Norm’s note: Dr. Susan Vosloo incisively summarizes the situation precisely as it is. Much that was deemed and disparaged as ‘conspiracy theory’ one year ago, is now being confirmed in reality, in her opinion.

Dr Vosloo was South Africa’s first female heart surgeon. She joined the heart team at the Groote Schuur hospital in 1984, and completed her training in 1988. She did her first heart transplant when she was 33 years old, and went on to work at the Christiaan Barnard Memorial Hospital, focusing on paediatric heart surgery. (Source)

The following highlights excerpted from the video, along with an additional link, are being pilfered from Concerned American Dad:

In the video:

Paula asked me to speak about the gene therapy that’s disguised as covid vaccinations and the question was “Are they effective and are they safe?”

…One of the views that really appealed to me was the vaccine was not brought in for covid but the covid was brought in for the vaccine. And once one realizes that, there are many  things that make more sense.

This is not really a health issue….if you calculate the deaths per thousand….it pales in significance…

This disease is the first medical condition ever that is predominately,  I would say mismanaged not by knowledgeable people but by politicians, beurocrats  and academics.

…and it’s fueled by relentless scare-mongering created by the media.

From the beginning it was very clear that there was no interest whatsoever in treating patients and relieving suffering and preventing death. The vaccine was shown as the only potential savior….

It is…. showing in the US that the risk of the vaccine is greater than the risk of the virus…

Just to remind you that 0.1 to 0.3 percent of the population may die, it it far less than 1%.

People are not informed of the potential risks of this vaccine…..there is no transparency, there is a lot of undue pressure on society to comply with this. This is totally in breach of any legal requirement where one is obliged to get free and proper informed consent from anybody that’s being vaccinated…

The composition of the vaccine is largely confidential…..

The big companies have all seriously bad track records…..Moderna has never previously manufactured any drugs for medical use.

The new technology is also hazardous…..the messenger rna that is injected is programmed to stimulate one’s own cells to create the spike protein……there is no off switch for this.

It is important for people to know that this is not FDA approved, there is only emergency use authorization.

Each participant that gets this treatment becomes part of a big trial.

There is absolutely no safety data.

Being vaccinated does not prevent transmission. It does not prevent infection and it does not prevent death.

….All the people I know, if they get sick the first question I ask is when did you get the vaccine. And 100% of my friends that had it has been sick with varying degrees of symptoms.

The know adverse events include death. They are severe neurological complications……..

There is a another concept called Antibody Dependent Enhancement(ADE)
the antibodies that one manufactures do not actually block the infection of the virus but instead increases its ability to infect cells.

Dr. James Lyons-Weiler at PA Medical Freedom Press Conference 10/20/20
Miracle Vaccine ~ Wait What? …Not So Fast

One of the most serious concerns is the funding of government regulatory bodies by conflicted donors……all have links to big pharma.

I do like the solution of disobedience and dissent. I think it would be important to start functioning out of all these planned systems.

I like to end with a quote by: “Let the views of others educate and inform you but let your decisions be the products of your own conclusions.”

Young adult mortality in Israel during time of COVID-19 crisis — Dr Steve Ohana and Dr Alexandra Henrion-Caude



, , , ,

[Norm’s note (Octobert 20th, 2021): NTB — This paper has been removed from SSRN at the request of the author, SSRN, or the rights holder. But you can still read it below, as I’ve managed to find a PDF version still posted on the web and that I’ve downloaded. Just follow the link, which I’ve updated, at the end of the post.]

Hat tip: Nick Hudson

Young adult mortality in Israel during time of COVID-19 crisis

Dr Steve Ohana1and Dr Alexandra Henrion-Caude2


2SimplissimA Research Institute, Port-Louis, Mauritius–E-mail:


Herein, we analyzed the mortality in Israel during time of COVID-19 crisis, focusing on the young adult age group below 50 years old, for their susceptibility to COVID-19 mortality is low. Mostly based on the online data from the Central Bureau of Statistics of Israel, we observed an unexpected rise of excess mortality among the 20 to 49-year-olds in February-March 2021. Noteworthy, excess mortality within those young age groups is scarcely observed, with low number of deaths that are usually caused by wars. We examined whether COVID-19 could account for this excess mortality. Inconsistency between the overall excess deaths and the number of reported COVID-19 deaths in this age group led to consider other potential causes: accident and vaccination. In fact, the surge in mortality coincides with the beginning of the Israeli vaccination campaign, which has reached more than 75% of individuals within this age group. Such unexpected rise in excess mortality in young adults was also found in two other countries, the United Kingdom and Hungary, which have in common with Israel to have massively injected their populations. Thus, our observations should prompt to pause the campaign, while clarifying the underlying reasons of those excess mortalities, all the more in the context of a low mortality risk from COVID-19 within adults below the age of 50.

Read the Whole document =====>Simplissima Research Institute, Port-Louis, Mauritius<=====

To Posterity — Bertolt Brecht



To Posterity

by Bertolt Brecht


Indeed I live in the dark ages!
A guileless word is an absurdity. A smooth forehead betokens
A hard heart. He who laughs
Has not yet heard
The terrible tidings.

Ah, what an age it is
When to speak of trees is almost a crime
For it is a kind of silence about injustice!
And he who walks calmly across the street,
Is he not out of reach of his friends
In trouble?

It is true: I earn my living
But, believe me, it is only an accident.
Nothing that I do entitles me to eat my fill.
By chance I was spared. (If my luck leaves me
I am lost.)

They tell me: eat and drink. Be glad you have it!
But how can I eat and drink
When my food is snatched from the hungry
And my glass of water belongs to the thirsty?
And yet I eat and drink.

I would gladly be wise.
The old books tell us what wisdom is:
Avoid the strife of the world
Live out your little time
Fearing no one
Using no violence
Returning good for evil —
Not fulfillment of desire but forgetfulness
Passes for wisdom.
I can do none of this:
Indeed I live in the dark ages!


I came to the cities in a time of disorder
When hunger ruled.
I came among men in a time of uprising
And I revolted with them.
So the time passed away
Which on earth was given me.

I ate my food between massacres.
The shadow of murder lay upon my sleep.
And when I loved, I loved with indifference.
I looked upon nature with impatience.
So the time passed away
Which on earth was given me.

In my time streets led to the quicksand.
Speech betrayed me to the slaughterer.
There was little I could do. But without me
The rulers would have been more secure. This was my hope.
So the time passed away
Which on earth was given me.


You, who shall emerge from the flood
In which we are sinking,
Think —
When you speak of our weaknesses,
Also of the dark time
That brought them forth.

For we went,changing our country more often than our shoes.
In the class war, despairing
When there was only injustice and no resistance.

For we knew only too well:
Even the hatred of squalor
Makes the brow grow stern.
Even anger against injustice
Makes the voice grow harsh. Alas, we
Who wished to lay the foundations of kindness
Could not ourselves be kind.

But you, when at last it comes to pass
That man can help his fellow man,
Do no judge us
Too harshly.

translated by H. R. Hays