Quote

Is the tide about to turn?

Featured

Tags

, , ,

Norm’s note: Christian Perronne addressing the Luxembourg parliament!!! Educating the politicians . . . and Alexandra Henrion-Caude and Luc Mongagnier, too!!!!

And this:

And this:

Infection fatality rate of COVID-19 in community-dwelling populations with emphasis on the elderly: An overview — Cathrine Axfors and John P A Ioannidis | medRxiv

Featured

Tags

, , , ,

Source: medRxiv

Infection fatality rate of COVID-19 in community-dwelling populations with emphasis on the elderly: An overview

By Cathrine Axfors, John P. A. Ioannidid

December 23, 2021

Read the study in PDF format: 2021.07.08.21260210v2.full

doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2021.07.08.21260210

The IFR of COVID-19 in community-dwelling elderly people is lower than previously reported. Very low IFRs were confirmed in the youngest populations

Cathrine Axfors, John P. A. Ioannidid

ABSTRACT

Objective This mixed design synthesis aimed to estimate the infection fatality rate (IFR) of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) in community-dwelling elderly populations and other age groups from seroprevalence studies. Protocol: https://osf.io/47cgb.

Methods and analyses Eligible were seroprevalence studies done in 2020 and identified by any of four existing systematic reviews; with ≥1000 participants aged ≥70 years that presented seroprevalence in elderly people; that aimed to generate samples reflecting the general population; and whose location had available data on cumulative COVID-19 deaths in elderly (primary cutoff ≥70 years; ≥65 or ≥60 also eligible). We extracted the most fully adjusted (if unavailable, unadjusted) seroprevalence estimates. We also extracted age- and residence-stratified cumulative COVID-19 deaths (until 1 week after the seroprevalence sampling midpoint) from official reports, and population statistics, to calculate IFRs corrected for unmeasured antibody types. Sample size-weighted IFRs were estimated for countries with multiple estimates. Secondary analyses examined data on younger age strata from the same studies.

Results Twenty-five seroprevalence surveys representing 14 countries were included. Across all countries, the median IFR in community-dwelling elderly and elderly overall was 2.9% (range 0.2%-6.9%) and 4.9% (range 0.2%-16.8%) without accounting for seroreversion (2.4% and 4.0%, respectively, accounting for 5% monthly seroreversion). Multiple sensitivity analyses yielded similar results. IFR was higher with larger proportions of people >85 years. Younger age strata had low IFR values (median 0.0013%, 0.0088%, 0.021%, 0.042%, 0.14%, and 0.65%, at 0-19, 20-29, 30-39, 40-49, 50-59, and 60-69 years even without accounting for seroreversion).

Conclusions The IFR of COVID-19 in community-dwelling elderly people is lower than previously reported. Very low IFRs were confirmed in the youngest populations.

Competing Interest Statement

The authors have declared no competing interest.

Funding Statement

No funding was received specifically for this work. Outside this work, the Meta-Research Innovation Center at Stanford (Stanford University) is supported by a grant from the Laura and John Arnold Foundation. Dr Axfors is supported by postdoctoral grants from the Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation, Uppsala University, the Swedish Society of Medicine, the Blanceflor Foundation, and the Sweden-America Foundation. The funders had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.

Author Declarations

I confirm all relevant ethical guidelines have been followed, and any necessary IRB and/or ethics committee approvals have been obtained.

Yes

The details of the IRB/oversight body that provided approval or exemption for the research described are given below:

Not applicable

I confirm that all necessary patient/participant consent has been obtained and the appropriate institutional forms have been archived, and that any patient/participant/sample identifiers included were not known to anyone (e.g., hospital staff, patients or participants themselves) outside the research group so cannot be used to identify individuals.

Yes

I understand that all clinical trials and any other prospective interventional studies must be registered with an ICMJE-approved registry, such as ClinicalTrials.gov. I confirm that any such study reported in the manuscript has been registered and the trial registration ID is provided (note: if posting a prospective study registered retrospectively, please provide a statement in the trial ID field explaining why the study was not registered in advance).

Yes

I have followed all appropriate research reporting guidelines and uploaded the relevant EQUATOR Network research reporting checklist(s) and other pertinent material as supplementary files, if applicable.

Yes

Paper in collection COVID-19 SARS-CoV-2 preprints from medRxiv and bioRxiv

 
 

Quote

bayesian datacrime: defining vaccine efficacy into existence — el gato malo | bad cattitude

Featured

Tags

, , , , , , , ,

Source: bad cattitude

this issue around dropping the two risk enhanced weeks has been with us from the beginning. it was baked into the drug trials as well and folks like pfizer do not make mistakes about issues like this, they make choices.

— el gato malo

bayesian datacrime: defining vaccine efficacy into existence

how the definitions of “full vaccinated” and now “boosted” are exaggerating (and possibly creating from whole cloth) VE and turning the data into gibberish

el gato malo

welcome to another edition of “stats with cats.”

today’s topic: how to use definitional legerdemain to make products look like they work, taint data, and fool the unwary.

let’s start in highly vaccinated iceland where, despite ~80% vaccination rates and over 50% of the population boosted, cases are literally exploding.

testing roughly doubled, but this is still a DRAMATIC move even adjusted for sample rate.

many have argued that vaccines are helping. this data makes it look like they are not. the vaccinated are getting covid at something like twice the rate of the unvaxxed.

but, one might argue, this DOES make it look like boosters work. but this is not so either and that’s what i’d like to dig into.


Continue reading this “stats with cats” ======>bad cattitude<======

Quote

Professor Ehud Qimron: “Ministry of Health, it’s time to admit failure” | Swiss Policy Research

Featured

Tags

, , , , , , , , , , , , ,

Source: Swiss Policy Research

Professor Ehud Qimron: “Ministry of Health, it’s time to admit failure”

Professor Ehud Qimron (center) at Tel Aviv University (Haaretz)

Published: January 10, 2022
Share on: TW / FB / TG

Professor Ehud Qimron, head of the Department of Microbiology and Immunology at Tel Aviv University and one of the leading Israeli immunologists, has written an open letter sharply criticizing the Israeli – and indeed global – management of the coronavirus pandemic.

Original letter in HebrewN12 News (January 6, 2022); translated by Google/SPR. See also: Professor Qimron’s prediction from August 2020: “History will judge the hysteria” (INN).

∗∗∗

Ministry of Health, it’s time to admit failure

In the end, the truth will always be revealed, and the truth about the coronavirus policy is beginning to be revealed. When the destructive concepts collapse one by one, there is nothing left but to tell the experts who led the management of the pandemic – we told you so.

Two years late, you finally realize that a respiratory virus cannot be defeated and that any such attempt is doomed to fail. You do not admit it, because you have admitted almost no mistake in the last two years, but in retrospect it is clear that you have failed miserably in almost all of your actions, and even the media is already having a hard time covering your shame.

You refused to admit that the infection comes in waves that fade by themselves, despite years of observations and scientific knowledge. You insisted on attributing every decline of a wave solely to your actions, and so through false propaganda “you overcame the plague.” And again you defeated it, and again and again and again.

You refused to admit that mass testing is ineffective, despite your own contingency plans explicitly stating so (“Pandemic Influenza Health System Preparedness Plan, 2007”, p. 26).

You refused to admit that recovery is more protective than a vaccine, despite previous knowledge and observations showing that non-recovered vaccinated people are more likely to be infected than recovered people. You refused to admit that the vaccinated are contagious despite the observations. Based on this, you hoped to achieve herd immunity by vaccination — and you failed in that as well.

You insisted on ignoring the fact that the disease is dozens of times more dangerous for risk groups and older adults, than for young people who are not in risk groups, despite the knowledge that came from China as early as 2020.

You refused to adopt the “Barrington Declaration”, signed by more than 60,000 scientists and medical professionals, or other common sense programs. You chose to ridicule, slander, distort and discredit them. Instead of the right programs and people, you have chosen professionals who lack relevant training for pandemic management (physicists as chief government advisers, veterinarians, security officers, media personnel, and so on).

You have not set up an effective system for reporting side effects from the vaccines and reports on side effects have even been deleted from your Facebook page. Doctors avoid linking side effects to the vaccine, lest you persecute them as you did to some of their colleagues. You have ignored many reports of changes in menstrual intensity and menstrual cycle times. You hid data that allows for objective and proper research (for example, you removed the data on passengers at Ben Gurion Airport). Instead, you chose to publish non-objective articles together with senior Pfizer executives on the effectiveness and safety of vaccines.

Irreversible damage to trust

However, from the heights of your hubris, you have also ignored the fact that in the end the truth will be revealed. And it begins to be revealed. The truth is that you have brought the public’s trust in you to an unprecedented low, and you have eroded your status as a source of authority. The truth is that you have burned hundreds of billions of shekels to no avail – for publishing intimidation, for ineffective tests, for destructive lockdowns and for disrupting the routine of life in the last two years.

You have destroyed the education of our children and their future. You made children feel guilty, scared, smoke, drink, get addicted, drop out, and quarrel, as school principals around the country attest. You have harmed livelihoods, the economy, human rights, mental health and physical health.

You slandered colleagues who did not surrender to you, you turned the people against each other, divided society and polarized the discourse. You branded, without any scientific basis, people who chose not to get vaccinated as enemies of the public and as spreaders of disease. You promote, in an unprecedented way, a draconian policy of discrimination, denial of rights and selection of people, including children, for their medical choice. A selection that lacks any epidemiological justification.

When you compare the destructive policies you are pursuing with the sane policies of some other countries — you can clearly see that the destruction you have caused has only added victims beyond the vulnerable to the virus. The economy you ruined, the unemployed you caused, and the children whose education you destroyed — are the surplus victims as a result of your own actions only.

There is currently no medical emergency, but you have been cultivating such a condition for two years now because of lust for power, budgets and control. The only emergency now is that you still set policies and hold huge budgets for propaganda and consciousness engineering instead of directing them to strengthen the health care system.

This emergency must stop!

Professor Udi Qimron, Faculty of Medicine, Tel Aviv University

∗∗∗

See also


Share on: Twitter / Facebook / Telegram

Quote

I can’t answer any of your questions, but I know these vaccines are “safe and effective.” Trust me.

Featured

Tags

, ,

Update (1/11/2021): found a substitute if longer version of the original video that Twitter does not want you to view:

Update: didn’t see that coming, eh. Twitter, the social media platform that is all about free speech and truth, deleting a candid video in which a pharmacist demonstrates and admits to his utter ignorance about what he has been telling all who he has been injecting is a “safe and effective” product. Oh well, what can you do except underscore the fact that absolutely no censorship of any genuine information is happening anywhere in both social and legacy media.

Norm’s note: “I shouldn’t be giving these vaccines, but that’s what I’m told to do.” How many other pharmacists out there are just doing what they are told to do? Right. Pretty much all of them. In essence, and as per the law and medical ethics, everyone who has taken the vaccines has been assaulted. Literally.

Quote

I’d say this is obligatory viewing: “Dr. Shankara Chetty Interview: All You Need to Know about the Omicron” — Dr. Jean-Pierre Kiekens | COVEXIT

Featured

Tags

, , , , , , , ,

I’d say this is obligatory viewing:

To view the interview, follow the link: Dr. Shankara Chetty Interview: All You Need to Know about the Omicron

Merely a screenshot:

Quote

UK Now Reports Myocarditis stratified by Age & Sex After Vaccine Or Sars-cov-2 — Vinay Prasad | Vinay Prasad’s Observations and Thoughts

Featured

Tags

, , ,

Source: Vinay Prasad’s Observations and Thoughts

UK Now Reports Myocarditis stratified by Age & Sex After Vaccine Or Sars-cov-2

Nature Medicine paper revisited: And it is shocking

By Vinay Prasad

December 26

This was the key figure in a Nature Medicine paper published on Dec 14, 2021. It showed clearly that myocarditis after vaccination (in this case, Moderna dose 2) was higher! than myocarditis after sars-cov-2 infection for people <40.

But the story does not end there….

There were a few remaining issues. While the denominator for vaccines is known with precision, the true number of infections is unknown. Many people don’t seek testing or medical care. So the red bar above will be shorter if you used a sero-prevalence (aka the correct) denominator. The authors needed to fix this.

The other problem is that this analysis lumps together men & women, while men have the greatest risk. Well, the authors are back with a new pre-print to fix this point, and here is what they find.

[. . .]


Continue reading this summary ======>Vinay Prasad’s Observations and Thoughts<======

Related:


Vinay Prasad MD MPH

My substack post on this topic: https://vinayprasadmdmph.substack.com…

Vinay Prasad, MD MPH; Physician & Associate Professor Google Scholar: https://scholar.google.com/citations?…

Substack: https://vinayprasadmdmph.substack.com/

Podcast: https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast…

Personal Website: http://www.vinayakkprasad.com

Laboratory Website: http://www.vkprasadlab.com

Podcast Website: http://www.plenarysessionpodcast.com

Academic Publications: http://www.vinayakkprasad.com/paper

Video

Sortie des avocats du collectif Réinfo Covid Québec

Featured

Tags

, , , , ,

Source: Rumble: Réinfo Covid Québec / Site: Réinfo Covid Québec

Rumble — Les avocats de Réinfo Covid Québec ont pris la parole le mardi 30 novembre, afin de lancer un message d’espoir : vous n’êtes pas seuls, ne croyez pas que tout le monde pense pareil.

Au cours d’une conférence marquante, 5 avocats ont pris tour à tour la parole au nom des professionnels (médecins, infirmières, enseignants, policiers, etc.) dans l’espoir de les encourager à reconnaître leur devoir et leur droit de liberté d’expression. Mais aussi au nom de tous les citoyens qui ont tenté de les contacter pour des services, désespérant d’obtenir les moyens de faire respecter leurs droits fondamentaux.

Enfin, ils s’expriment au nom de leurs confrères et consœurs qui sont dans l’ombre et qui craignent de s’exprimer dans la situation préoccupante que nous vivons tous.

Issus de plusieurs domaines, allant d’avocat en pratique privée, jusqu’à professeur en droit à l’université, ils nous lancent un formidable message d’espoir. Nous les remercions pour leur courage, leur humilité et leur intégrité.

Quote

What leads to more spike protein in the body: the vaccine or virus? Part 2 — Joomi Kim | Let’s Be Clear

Featured

Tags

, , , ,

[Norm’s note: if you haven’t seen this debriefing of a conversation with Dr. Kevin McKernan on ‘what is being injected into us’ by way of the mRNA injectables, in terms of what gets transfected or expressed and the consequent probable biological effects, I highly recommend it (yeah, it’s longish, but I think there is a lot here of value for the layman): GigaohmBiological]

Source: Let’s Be Clear

What leads to more spike protein in the body: the vaccine or virus? Part 2

By Joomi Kim

Brief Background

The SARS-CoV-2 virus has a protein on its surface called the spike protein. The COVID vaccines available in the U.S. work by getting the body to produce this protein, with some modifications.

In a previous article, I went over multiple pieces of evidence showing that the spike protein alone, either from the virus or vaccine, was harmful.

In Part 1 of this article, I responded to an article by Uri Manor and Jeremy Howard. Their article claimed that:

(1) The amount of spike protein from the COVID vaccines was harmless or physiologically negligible.

(2) The amount of spike protein from the COVID vaccines was much lower than what one would get under viral infection from SARS-CoV-2.

They used these claims to argued that if you were trying to gain immunity, it was safer to get it via the vaccines than with infection by the virus.

In Part 1, I argued that the study that Manor and Howard used to make claim (1) did not actually measure all physiologically relevant spike protein. I also argued that we already had evidence that the levels of spike protein from the vaccines were physiologically relevant.

In this article, I’ll examine claim (2).

[. . .]


Continue reading this analysis ======>Let’s Be Clear<======

Quote

Omicron is a live-attenuated viral vaccine… — Dr. Jessica Rose | The unforgivable sins of 2021

Featured

Tags

, , , , ,

Source: The unforgivable sins of 2021

Omicron is a live-attenuated viral vaccine…

Nature wins again

By Dr. Jessica Rose

That’s all I have to say.

Omicron Greek Letter Size:12 Inch Thickness:1/8" Baltic ...

Norm’s note: while I’m inclined to agree with Jessica Rose, that is to say, that Omicron — which probably has already mutated into a multiplicity of other strains — is a natural inoculant or immunizing antigen, in not being very virulent, but contagious, others are beginning to speculate about a second laboratory origin, on account of the numerous ‘mutations’ this mutant strain presents.  In my humble opinion, one needs to keep in mind that just because an act of sequencing and discovery happens on a given date, does not mean that the lineage of the strain hasn’t been, in terms of viral replication, a long time coming, or that it’s line of descent will be easily traceable.  The apparent break in evolution may be an artifact of resources deployed and methods of investigation. Still, the hypothesis is not beyond the realm of possibility.  A couple of intriguing references:

And see this:

A)

Golden Silkworms in Pandora’s Box: Why understanding COVID-19 and Seasonal Influenza as Quasispecies Mutant Swarms reveals the Quantum Origins and Cryptic Fates of Human Pandemics. — Dan Sirotkin  | Harvard2TheBigHouse – Straight to your House

B)

Might SARS‐CoV‐2 Have Arisen via Serial Passage through an Animal Host or Cell Culture? A potential explanation for much of the novel coronavirus’ distinctive genome, Karl Sirotkin and Dan Sirotkin  | National Library of Medicine

C) I’d say this is obligatory viewing:

Video

Le Samedi Politique – Covid : 2 heures de vérité après 2 ans de mensonges ! — TVlibertés

Featured

Tags

, , ,

Source: TVlibertés

Hat tip: Dr. Alexandra Henrion-Caude

Rumble — Mobilisez-vous !
—————————————————-
******POUR FAIRE UN DON*****
https://www.tvlibertes.com/don
—————————————————
Pour ce dernier “Samedi Politique” de l’année 2021, Elise Blaise reçoit quatre invités prestigieux, tous scientifiques : le docteur Alexandra Henrion-Caude, généticienne spécialiste de l’ARN, le professeur Christian Perronne, infectiologue et ancien conseiller des gouvernements en matière de santé publique, le docteur Laurent Toubiana, épidémiologiste et directeur de l’IRSAN, et le docteur Laurent Montesino, médecin réanimateur, ainsi que la participation du généticien moléculaire, Christian Vélot et le témoignage de Marc Doyer, dont l’épouse, Mauricette, aurait contracté la maladie de Creutzfeld-Jakob après la deuxième injection du vaccin Pfizer.

Au fil de ces deux heures d’émission, la stratégie du gouvernement et ses effets sont passés au crible pour expliquer pourquoi un an après le lancement de la campagne de vaccination, les pouvoirs publics et médiatiques continuent de faire peur aux Français.

Manipulation des chiffres, prise en charge des patients malades du Covid, traitements interdits, vaccination massive et effets secondaires, conflits d’intérêts… tous les sujets que les médias refusent d’aborder avec honnêteté et sérieux sont traités ici, par des scientifiques et des praticiens de renom.
Une émission de TVLibertés, que vous ne verrez pas ailleurs !

Video

Panel avec Conseil scientifique indépendant de Réinfo Covid Québec | Réinfo Covid Québec

Featured

Tags

, , , , , , , , , ,

Source: Réinfo Covid Québec / Rumble: Réinfo Covid Québec

Rumble — Panel avec Conseil scientifique indépendant de Réinfo Covid Québec au cours de laquelle des médecins interrogent des scientifiques quant à l’injection des enfants. D’après l’INSPQ, aucun enfant de 5-11 ans n’est décédé de la Covid au Québec et seulement 18 ont été hospitalisés.

Rejoignez notre collectif en remplissant notre formulaire sur www.reinfocovid.ca

Voici les sources scientifiques qui soutiennent la vidéo:

– Vaccination contre la COVID-19 chez les jeunes âgés de 5 à 11 ans au Québec : https://mobile.inspq.qc.ca/sites/default/files/publications/3181-vaccination-covid-19-jeunes-5-11-ans.pdf

– L’absence de fondement scientifique du mandat de vaccination pour la COVID-19 : l’inefficacité des vaccins géniques pour enrayer la propagation du SRAS-CoV-2 : https://reinfocovid.ca/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Opinion-dexpert-Bernard-Massie.pdf

– Steven R Gundry. Abstract 10712: Mrna COVID Vaccines Dramatically Increase Endothelial Inflammatory Markers and ACS Risk as Measured by the PULS Cardiac Test: a Warning. Originally published 8 Nov 2021Circulation. 2021;144:A10712 (https://www.ahajournals.org/doi/10.1161/circ.144.suppl_1.10712)

– Jiang H, Mei YF. SARS-CoV-2 Spike Impairs DNA Damage Repair and Inhibits V(D)J Recombination In Vitro. Viruses. 2021 Oct 13;13(10):2056. doi: 10.3390/v13102056. PMID: 34696485 (https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/34696485/)

– Cadre de référence en gestion des risques pour la santé dans le réseau québécois de la santé publique, Institut national de la santé publique du Québec (2003) https://www.inspq.qc.ca/pdf/publications/163_CadreReferenceGestionRisques.pdf

– La gestion de risques en santé publique au Québec : cadre de référence, Institut national de la santé publique du Québec (2016) https://www.inspq.qc.ca/sites/default/files/publications/2106_gestion_risques_sante_publique.pdf

– Loi sur les services de santé et les services sociaux – Partie 1- Droits des usagers http://legisquebec.gouv.qc.ca/fr/document/lc/s-4.2

Quote

Time to take away the hall pass we gave doctors and scientists…time to hold them fully responsible for the disaster we faced with lockdowns and these vaccines…their complicity allowed it — Dr Paul Alexander | Alexander COVID News

Featured

Tags

, , , , , , , , ,

Source: Alexander COVID News

Time to take away the hall pass we gave doctors and scientists…time to hold them fully responsible for the disaster we faced with lockdowns and these vaccines…their complicity allowed it

POX on you, Kuntsler is right…I argued this, we are in a catastrophe because of money hungry, pusillanimous doctors, lived behind broad spectrum antibiotics…came up short when we needed them most

By Dr Paul Alexander

December 18, 2021

Had it not been for the likes of McCullough, Fareed, Zelenko, Tenenbaum, Oskoui, Urso, Littell, Malone, Vanden Bossche, Yeadon, Ryan Cole, Kulvinder Gill, Francis Christian, Trozzi, Phillips, Palmer, Hodkinson, Bhattacharya, Heneghan, Kulldorff, Bridle, Mallard, Bernstein, Risch etc. to me, take the whole lot of the million doctors and fire them all…every one damn of them, they have caused this by being silent and being on the take…yes, I know many from CDC and NIH and even FDA who told me they cant speak out because of fear of losing their appointment and grant…yes, this be about money…grift and graft…they have all benefitted and of course the top dog Bourla of Pfizer with his buddy Fauci…imagine this grifter Bourla saying we are criminals because we question the efficacy and safety of the vaccines…this piece of untermensche s***….

The Canadian and UK and American doctor, yes Kuntsler, have shown themselves to be among the most dweeb, pusillanimous, weak, cowardly, craven, money hungry, grifters, stiff necked idiots and fools…money whores to the pharma…selling out the good populations for benefit to yourself…you sick twisted set of doctors…you dont see it yet but your gravitas id now DOA…and you did it to you. you had it all and now are worth nothing. you helped destroy your careers, your name, EBM, research, all of it…you did this…you joined a devious scheme and history will recall and remind you always of what you did. you are utterly corrupt and I tell you in your face here…corrupt untermensche.


Continue reading this heartfelt indictment ======>Alexander COVID News<======

Video

A short reminder of what “they” said then and are saying now . . .

Featured

Tags

, , , ,

Norm’s note: the next time someone tells you that the mRNA injectables were never orginaly sold to the public as ‘vaccines’ that prevented transmission and therefore prevented illness outright, but rather always merely as therapeutics to reduce the number of severe outcomes from infection, try to recall this short collection of soundbites to yourself:

Quote

What leads to more spike protein in the body: the vaccine or virus? Part 1: A reply to an article by Uri Manor and Jeremy Howard — Joomi Kim | Let’s Be Clear

Featured

Tags

, , , , , , , ,

Source: Let’s Be Clear

What leads to more spike protein in the body: the vaccine or virus? Part 1

A reply to an article by Uri Manor and Jeremy Howard

By Joomi Kim

November 11, 2021

Background

The SARS-CoV-2 virus has a protein on its surface called the spike protein. The COVID vaccines available in the U.S. work by getting the body to produce this protein (with some modifications). 

In a previous article, I went over multiple pieces of evidence showing that the spike protein alone, either from the virus or vaccine, is harmful.

A few people responded to that article by bringing up Uri Manor, an Assistant Research Professor at the Salk Institute, and senior co-author of a paper by Lei et al., which was one of the studies showing that spike protein was harmful. This paper was also one of the studies I linked to and briefly discussed in my previous article about the spike protein.

After the Lei et al. paper came out, some said that it was being used to spawn “anti-vax discussions”:

In Manor’s reply, he said that “the (relatively) small amount of spike protein produced by the mRNA vaccine would not be nearly enough to do any damage.”

Later on, Manor cited a study by Ogata et al., which actually measured the amount of free spike protein in the plasma of Moderna vaccine recipients:

Congrats to @OgataAlana on this important study. Many asked how much spike protein gets into circulation after vaccination. Turns out to average ~30-40 pg/mL for a few days then disappears.

FYI: This is ~100,000x less than used in our paper (4 ug/mL).

https://academic.oup.com/cid/advance-article/doi/10.1093/cid/ciab465/6279075

Originally tweeted by Uri Manor (@manorlaboratory) on May 21, 2021.

Manor said that the Ogata study showed that the amount of free spike was ~100,000 times less than the paper he was a co-author on (the one which showed harmful effects of the spike protein).

After that, he and Jeremy Howard produced this article:

SARS-CoV-2 spike protein impairment of endothelial function does not impact vaccine safety

In their article, Manor and Howard don’t seem to deny the possibility that the spike protein from vaccines is harmful, but argue that the amount of spike protein produced from them is physiologically negligible.

Side note: you may have heard of Jeremy Howard in the context of data science or machine learning. Yes, this is the same Jeremy Howard.

So let’s look at what the Ogata study shows and examine the claims made by Manor and Howard.

[. . .]


Continue reading this analysis ======>Let’s Be Clear<======

Self-Organized Criticality Theory of Autoimmunity — Ken Tsumiyama, Yumi Miyazaki, and Shunichi Shiozawa | PLOS ONE

Featured

Tags

, , , , , , , , , ,

Hat tip and brief contextualizing comment:

Source: PLOS ONE

Self-Organized Criticality Theory of Autoimmunity

Ken Tsumiyama, Yumi Miyazaki, Shunichi Shiozawa

December 31, 2009

Abstract

Background

The cause of autoimmunity, which is unknown, is investigated from a different angle, i.e., the defect in immune ‘system’, to explain the cause of autoimmunity.

Methodology/Principal Findings

Repeated immunization with antigen causes systemic autoimmunity in mice otherwise not prone to spontaneous autoimmune diseases. Overstimulation of CD4+ T cells led to the development of autoantibody-inducing CD4+ T (aiCD4+ T) cell which had undergone T cell receptor (TCR) revision and was capable of inducing autoantibodies. The aiCD4+ T cell was induced by de novo TCR revision but not by cross-reaction, and subsequently overstimulated CD8+ T cells, driving them to become antigen-specific cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTL). These CTLs could be further matured by antigen cross-presentation, after which they caused autoimmune tissue injury akin to systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE).

Conclusions/Significance

Systemic autoimmunity appears to be the inevitable consequence of over-stimulating the host’s immune ‘system’ by repeated immunization with antigen, to the levels that surpass system’s self-organized criticality.


Continue reading this research paper ======>Source: PLOS ONE<======

Quote

Immunology 101: why intramuscular COVID-19 vaccination must fail | Doctors for COVID Ethics

Featured

Tags

, , , ,

Source: Doctors for COVID Ethics

05/12/2021

Immunology 101: Why Intramuscular COVID-19 Vaccination Must Fail

Analysis

Many countries are currently experiencing a wave of COVID-19 “breakthrough cases” in spite of high vaccination rates. In this paper, we explain the fundamental reason why such cases had to be expected: the antibodies induced by intramuscular vaccination will only circulate in the bloodstream, but they will not reach the surface of the mucous membranes in the upper airways. We also briefly discuss possible mechanisms of vaccine-induced immunopathology.

Some of material discussed in this paper is also covered in a recent video by Dr. Bhakdi.

The article is available for view and download: summary-Abs2bDownload

Quote

Age adjusted all cause mortality trends 2000-2021 in Europe — Orwell2024 | Orwell2024’s Newsletter

Featured

Tags

, , , , , , , ,

Hat tip: Dr. Norman Fenton

Source: Orwell2024’s Newsletter

By Orwell2024

December 09, 2021

The following works was motivated by the current focus on the observed all cause excess mortality, e.g. in Austria and the Netherlands. Examples are: AT (and my quick review) and this article from NL. Those news were the motivation to analyse if there is an issue or not. In order to do this, we need to make a real age adjusted analysis and look at fluctuation trends from previous years.

1 Data preparation

1.1 Data Sources

Standard populations:
https://seer.cancer.gov/stdpopulations/stdpop.19ages.html
Note: The last age group was split in two, a 85-89 bin (2/3 of 85+) and a 90+ bin (1/3 of 85+). The 2/3 and 1/3 value is based on the current relative populations observed in those age groups in Europe.

EU Deaths by week, sex, 5-year age group and country:
https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/DEMO_R_MWK_05__custom_1721660/default/table?lang=en

EU population by 1 year age group, sex, year, country):
https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/databrowser/view/DEMO_PJAN__custom_1643622/default/table?lang=en
Note: The population for 2021 is not available yet. The 2021 dataset was created using linear extrapolation by age group using 2019 and 2020 population data (formula pop2021 = pop2020+(pop2020-pop2019)).

1.2 Standard populations

From the following source for standard populations, the below dataset was created. The last age group was split in two bins (to match the EC death age bins), a 85-89 bin (2/3 of 85+) and a 90+ bin (1/3 of 85+). The 2/3 and 1/3 value is based on the current relative populations observed in those age groups in Europe. In addition, a new empiric reference was generated from the NL 2011 population which is here named NL2011 (it is relatively close to ESP2013 as can be seen). As expected, the WHO and World standards are giving a higher weight to the younger population. The same is true for the older standards from 1960.

Standard Populations visualized. NL2011 (population pyramid from 2011) is added as reference.

Continue reading this analysis ======>Orwell2024’s Newsletter<======

Quote

Disentangling post-vaccination symptoms from early COVID-19 — Liane S. Canas, PhD et al. | EClinicalMedicine

Featured

Tags

, , , , , ,

Hat tip and link:

This is an open access publication: Published:December 01, 2021 DOI:https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2021.101212

Abstract

Background

Identifying and testing individuals likely to have SARS-CoV-2 is critical for infection control, including post-vaccination. Vaccination is a major public health strategy to reduce SARS-CoV-2 infection globally. Some individuals experience systemic symptoms post-vaccination, which overlap with COVID-19 symptoms. This study compared early post-vaccination symptoms in individuals who subsequently tested positive or negative for SARS-CoV-2, using data from the COVID Symptom Study (CSS) app.

Methods

We conducted a prospective observational study in 1,072,313 UK CSS participants who were asymptomatic when vaccinated with Pfizer-BioNTech mRNA vaccine (BNT162b2) or Oxford-AstraZeneca adenovirus-vectored vaccine (ChAdOx1 nCoV-19) between 8 December 2020 and 17 May 2021, who subsequently reported symptoms within seven days (N=362,770) (other than local symptoms at injection site) and were tested for SARS-CoV-2 (N=14,842), aiming to differentiate vaccination side-effects per se from superimposed SARS-CoV-2 infection. The post-vaccination symptoms and SARS-CoV-2 test results were contemporaneously logged by participants. Demographic and clinical information (including comorbidities) were recorded. Symptom profiles in individuals testing positive were compared with a 1:1 matched population testing negative, including using machine learning and multiple models considering UK testing criteria.

Findings

Differentiating post-vaccination side-effects alone from early COVID-19 was challenging, with a sensitivity in identification of individuals testing positive of 0.6 at best. Most of these individuals did not have fever, persistent cough, or anosmia/dysosmia, requisite symptoms for accessing UK testing; and many only had systemic symptoms commonly seen post-vaccination in individuals negative for SARS-CoV-2 (headache, myalgia, and fatigue).

Interpretation

Post-vaccination symptoms per se cannot be differentiated from COVID-19 with clinical robustness, either using symptom profiles or machine-derived models. Individuals presenting with systemic symptoms post-vaccination should be tested for SARS-CoV-2 or quarantining, to prevent community spread.

Funding

UK Government Department of Health and Social Care, Wellcome Trust, UK Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council, UK National Institute for Health Research, UK Medical Research Council and British Heart Foundation, Chronic Disease Research Foundation, Zoe Limited.


Continue reading =====>Disentangling post-vaccination symptoms from early COVID-19<======

Quote

The vaccine gold rush and the damning ivermectin tape — Neville Hodgkinson | TCW: Defending Freedom

Featured

Tags

, , , , , , , , , ,

Hat tip:

Source: The Conservative Woman

The vaccine gold rush and the damning ivermectin tape

By Neville Hodgkinson

December 2, 2021

CORRUPTION in medicine, as detailed in a new book by American trial lawyer Robert Kennedy Jr, is nothing new. 

A leading UK cancer specialist told me years ago how he was blackmailed by the Imperial Cancer Research Fund into staying silent over a fraudulent study the fund had sponsored.

Published in the Lancet, the study purported to show that patients treated holistically through the Bristol Cancer Help Centre did worse than those who had only orthodox treatment. It was junk science, aimed at discrediting the charity whose work had gained prominence – and funds – after being championed by Prince Charles.

The specialist was outraged when he had a preview of the study, and told the ICRF that he intended to challenge its findings at an upcoming press conference. Shortly afterwards a top official rang him to say that if he did so, his unit would lose its entire ICRF grant – which meant it would have to close. He consulted the dean of his medical school, and agreed not to go. He had worried ever since over whether he made the right decision.

Fortunately, the help centre recovered from the attack and its work has been transformative in encouraging cancer treatment approaches that attend as much to a patient’s general wellbeing as to diagnosing and treating symptoms.

As detailed by Kennedy, however, medical corruption has today become so widespread as to compromise the lives and wellbeing of us all. 

Continue reading

Quote

Pr Alexandra Henrion Caude : « Il faut arrêter de traiter la population saine comme si elle était malade » — Pr Alexandra Henrion Caude | Le Mauricien

Featured

Tags

, , , , , , , , , ,

Source: Le Mauricien

Pr Alexandra Henrion Caude : « Il faut arrêter de traiter la population saine comme si elle était malade »

Alexandra Henrion Caude / 1 Déc 2021 03h00

La Pr Alexandra Henrion Caude est une généticienne, directrice de recherche de l’Institut SimplissimA à Maurice et ancienne directrice de recherche de l’hôpital Necker à Paris. De France où elle vit l’expérience du Covid-19 au quotidien, elle a bienveillamment répondu aux questions de Week-End comme elle l’avait fait en février 2020 et en janvier 2021. Elle évoque l’évolution de l’épidémie du Covid-19 et regrette que les autorités locales n’aient pas entendu son message de se concentrer uniquement sur la population malade.

La pandémie globale du Covid-19 n’arrête pas de rebondir. On en est à la cinquième vague. Préconisez-vous de ne s’occuper que des malades ?

Je vous avais répondu en janvier 2021 sur la situation globale en matière de Covid-19. À l’époque, j’insistais sur l’urgence de redonner toute l’attention du ministère de la Santé sur sa population malade et uniquement les malades, et d’arrêter de traiter la population saine comme si elle était malade. Cela reste ma recommandation. Sans compter qu’une telle recommandation permet de diminuer grandement la quantité de stress qui met en danger gravement la population, et notamment les diabétiques.

Mon appel d’aujourd’hui reste donc le même, mais avec beaucoup plus d’insistance ! En traitant la population saine comme si elle était malade, on l’a fait entrer dans une étude expérimentale dont les résultats à travers le monde, et sans aucune exception, sont non seulement décevants d’après le consensus, voire catastrophiques d’après certains scientifiques et des médecins, qu’on tente de faire taire par la censure ou le travestissement de leurs propos. J’en sais quelque chose étant en contact avec des collègues du monde entier… Certains ont accepté de perdre leur travail au nom de la vérité. Récemment, un médecin allemand s’est tragiquement donné la mort justifiant par une lettre qu’il ne supportait plus de devoir travailler avec tant de mensonges.

En quoi la campagne de vaccination est-elle décevante ?

Si on reprend l’histoire récente pour la justifier, la communauté scientifique s’est reposée sur une idée totalement théorique d’immunité collective (herd immunity), et qui s’est trouvée totalement démentie. Aux États-Unis, les scientifiques comme le Dr Anthony Fauci la qualifient volontiers de « mystique ». Je le cite : « Je dis toujours qu’il y a cette terminologie insaisissable et quelque peu mystique d’”immunité collective” et de “seuil d’immunité collective”. » Ainsi, la justification de la vaccination collective a été fondée sur une croyance théorique qui ne repose sur aucune réalité tangible. Ces idées non-scientifiques ont aussi amené la communauté à douter de l’existence même d’une immunité naturelle, alors que tous les articles s’accordent maintenant à admettre que cette immunité naturelle existe bel et bien, et qu’elle reste d’ailleurs la plus durable et la plus efficace contre une réinfection par de nouveaux variants !

Une deuxième raison pour laquelle cette campagne a déçu, c’est qu’on s’est rendu compte que ces injections n’empêchaient pas du tout la transmission, qu’elles n’empêchaient pas les double-vaccinés d’avoir le Covid-19 ni d’en mourir, et enfin, qu’elle devenait inefficace si rapidement (en 5-6 mois) qu’il fallait injecter les populations chroniquement. N’est-on pas déjà arrivé à la troisième dose et dans certains pays, la quatrième… C’est bien une histoire sans fin, sans l’assurance que l’immunité ne continue de baisser entre deux injections, et donc finisse par ne plus marcher du tout. C’est une question que de nombreux immunologues se posent, car ils sont surpris par cette baisse si rapide de la défense. Pour moi, il faudrait considérer le pass comme ce qu’il est : un outil de contrôle politique qui, du point de vue sanitaire, s’apparente à un AVC, c’est-à-dire un Abonnement Vaccinal Chronique. Ce serait plus exact.

À Maurice comme ailleurs, plus on est vacciné, plus il y a de cas positifs, plus il y a de morts. Y a-t-il vraiment un lien de cause à effet ?


Continuer la lecture de cet entretien ======>Le Mauricien<======

Austria Plans Enormous Fines, Incarceration For Vaccine Refusers: Every day brings worse news — eugyppius: a plague chronicle

Featured

Tags

, ,

Source: eugyppius: a plague chronicle

Austria Plans Enormous Fines, Incarceration For Vaccine Refusers

Every day brings worse news.

Short update on the Austrian vaccine mandates, which grow every day more disturbing. Early rumours, that unvaccinated Austrians would face substantial fines or incarceration, have been confirmed by draft legislation leaked to the Austrian press.

The plan is for local authorities to summon the recalcitrant to vaccination appointments. Those who don’t accept these binding invitations will receive a second summons, and further refusal will result in a fine of 3,600 Euros, or four weeks of incarceration. Repeated refusals could result in a doubling of the fine, to 7,200 Euros. Higher fines can also be imposed if the refusal to accept vaccination is deemed to cause “a serious danger to someone’s life or health.”

The law is envisioned to remain in force for at least three years.

Today saw renewed protests across the country.

UPDATE: I too am angry and also deeply depressed by developments in Austria. Please, for your protection and mine, avoid comments that could be interpreted in any way as condoning or advocating violence.

Subscribe to eugyppius: a plague chronicle

By eugyppius  ·  Thousands of subscribers

We are witnessing an unprecedented, comprehensive failure of policy, medicine and science. The world will never be the same.

Quote

Maternal COVID-19 Vaccination and Its Potential Impact on Fetal and Neonatal Development — Niel A. Karrow et al. | PubMed Central

Featured

Tags

, , , ,

Hat tip: Dr. Doug Corrigan / Kevin McKernan 

Source: PubMed Central

Maternal COVID-19 Vaccination and Its Potential Impact on Fetal and Neonatal Development

Published online 2021 Nov 18. doi: 10.3390/vaccines9111351

Niel A. Karrow,1,* Umesh K. Shandilya,1 Steven Pelech,2 Lauraine Wagter-Lesperance,3 Deanna McLeod,4 Byram Bridle,3 and Bonnie A. Mallard3

Stefano D’Errico, Academic Editor

Copyright © 2021 by the authors.Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

Abstract

Vaccines have been developed at “warp speed” to combat the COVID-19 pandemic caused by the SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus. Although they are considered the best approach for preventing mortality, when assessing the safety of these vaccines, pregnant women have not been included in clinical trials. Thus, vaccine safety for this demographic, as well as for the developing fetus and neonate, remains to be determined. A global effort has been underway to encourage pregnant women to get vaccinated despite the uncertain risk posed to them and their offspring. Given this, post-hoc data collection, potentially for years, will be required to determine the outcomes of COVID-19 and vaccination on the next generation. Most COVID-19 vaccine reactions include injection site erythema, pain, swelling, fatigue, headache, fever and lymphadenopathy, which may be sufficient to affect fetal/neonatal development. In this review, we have explored components of the first-generation viral vector and mRNA COVID-19 vaccines that are believed to contribute to adverse reactions and which may negatively impact fetal and neonatal development. We have followed this with a discussion of the potential for using an ovine model to explore the long-term outcomes of COVID-19 vaccination during the prenatal and neonatal periods.


Continue reading this study ======>PubMed Central<======

Quote

The Left’s Covid failure: Amplifying the crisis is no way to rebuild trust — Toby Green and Thomas Fazi | UnHerd

Featured

Tags

, , , , , , , ,

Source: UnHerd

The Left’s Covid failure: Amplifying the crisis is no way to rebuild trust

BY TOBY GREEN AND THOMAS FAZI

Throughout the various phases of the global pandemic, people’s preferences in terms of epidemiological strategies have tended to overlap closely with their political orientation. Ever since Donald Trump and Jair Bolsonaro expressed doubts as to the wisdom of a lockdown strategy in March 2020, liberals and those on the Left of the Western political spectrum, including most socialists, have fallen over themselves to adhere in public to the lockdown strategy of pandemic mitigation — and lately to the logic of vaccine passports. Now as countries across Europe experiment with tighter restrictions of the unvaccinated, Left-wing commentators — usually so vocal in the defence of minorities suffering from discrimination — are notable for their silence.

As writers who have always positioned ourselves on the Left, we are disturbed at this turn of events. Is there really no progressive criticism to be made about the quarantining of healthy individuals, when the latest research suggests there is a vanishingly small difference in terms of transmission between the vaccinated and the unvaccinated? The Left’s response to Covid now appears as part of a broader crisis in Left-wing politics and thought — one which has been going on for three decades at least. So it’s important to identify the process through which this has taken shape.

[. . .]


Continue to read this essay ======>UnHerd<======

Quote

Fresh doubts over data integrity in Pfizer mRNA trial — Maryanne Demasi, PhD | Investigative Journalism

Featured

Tags

, , , , , , , , ,

Source: Investigative Journalism

Fresh doubts over data integrity in Pfizer mRNA trial

30 November 2021

Whistle-blower speaks out

By Maryanne Demasi, PhD

Brook Jackson, Whistle-blower
Brook Jackson, Whistle-blower

Leaked documents have cast fresh doubts over the integrity of data arising from Pfizer’s pivotal COVID-19 vaccine trial and suggest problems at Ventavia are ongoing. 

Earlier this month, whistle-blower Brook Jackson, raised serious concerns about ‘falsified data’ in Pfizer’s mRNA trial (Comirnaty) to The BMJ. The concerns were corroborated by two former Ventavia employees. 

Authorities were quick to allay public anxiety. 

Drug regulators in Australia (TGA) and the US (FDA) released statements assuring the public they had full confidence in the data. Further, the benefits of the Pfizer vaccine outweighed the risks.

High profile researchers were sceptical. “It’s all this sort of vague kind of hand waving ….that The BMJ published it doesn’t make it any more true,” said vaccine expert Dr Paul Offit.

Ventavia, the Texas-based company at the centre of the controversy, released a statement claiming that, in respect of Ms Jackson, “no part of her job responsibilities concerned the clinical trials at issue.”

Undeterred, Ms Jackson fired back.

Ventavia and its spokesperson Lauren Foreman, were served with a cease-and-desist letter, by attorney Robert Barnes, acting on behalf of whistle-blower, Ms Jackson.

Of Ventavia’s claims, the demand letter says: 


Continue reading this exposé =====>Investigative Journalism<======

Video

Behind The Curtain with Dr. Jessica Rose – Episode 90 | FrankMcCaughey 

Featured

Tags

Related: Censorship = dictatorship By Jessica Rose

Source: FrankMcCaughey 

Behind The Curtain with Dr. Jessica Rose – Episode 90

Rumble — Please Share this podcast if you feel it might be of interest to anyone.

Jessica’s Website
https://i-do-not-consent.netlify.app

This is the peer reviewed paper discussed most in the podcast.

1) A Report on Myocarditis Adverse Events in the U.S. Vaccine Adverse

Here is an excellent podcast with Gal Shalev and Jessica that I mention at the start.
https://rumble.com/vouo1t-gal-shalev-interview-with-dr.-jessica-rose-interview-vaers-data.html

Dr. Jessica Rose was born in Ontario, Canada into an academically oriented family. She pursued her Bachelor of Science in Applied Mathematics at Memorial University of Newfoundland (MUN) immediately after high school and subsequently, a Master’s in Medicine in Immunology at MUN. She was one of 5 esteemed graduates of a newly established interdisciplinary degree program pursing a master’s degree in Medicine with a focus on Immunology. She continued with her studies in Israel, having been invited to pursue a PhD in Computational Biology at Bar Ilan University. Since its completion, she has successfully completed two Post-Doctoral degrees in Molecular Biology, with a focus on Rickettsiology at the Hebrew University of Jerusalem, and Biochemistry, with a focus on Anisotropic Network modeling of ATP-Cassette-Binding Transporter molecule mechanisms at the Technion Institute of Technology.

She took a break following completion of the final Post Doc in December 2019 in perfect sync with the declaration of the global ‘pandemic’. She used this an opportunity to pursue the task of teaching herself ‘R’ using the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) data from the United States. Since then, she has published her findings in the journal ‘Science, Public Health Policy and the Law’ and has two other publications in peer review soon to be published – both pertaining to VAERS data. One of the manuscripts is a critical appraisal of VAERS pharmacovigilance and the other is a review of Myocarditis adverse events.

She has progressed in leaps and bounds with R and has since created a website that publishes her data live weekly. You are most welcome to visit this site: https://i-do-not-consent.netlify.app. She has also since become the first recipient of the Joshua Kuntz Research Fellowship that honors the life and passing of Joshua Kuntz – is a young man who lived with the unintended adverse effects of a vaccine.

Video

RéinfoCovid Québec’s Press Conference on Mandatory Vaccines — Alexa Lavoie | Rebel News

Featured

Tags

, , , , , ,

RéinfoCovid Québec’s Press Conference on Mandatory Vaccines

Rumble — RéinfoCovid Québec wants to have a scientific and healthy debate on both child vaccination and mandatory vaccination.
FULL REPORT from Alexa Lavoie ► https://rebelne.ws/3FSdG8K

Rebel News: Telling the other side of the story. https://www.RebelNews.com for more great Rebel content.

Unlike almost all of our mainstream media competitors, Rebel News doesn’t receive any government funding. We rely on our generous audience to help keep us reporting.

Please consider supporting Rebel News by making a donation, purchasing a RebelNews+ subscription, shopping in our online store, or any of the other methods below:

►Support our independent journalism – https://rebelne.ws/donation
►Sign up for our free emails and newsletters! – https://rebelne.ws/emails
►Charitable donations for ‘Fight the Fines’ can be made to The Democracy Fund – https://www.rebelnews.com/help_fight_the_fines_democracy_fund
►Donate in cryptocurrency – http://rebelne.ws/crypto
►Rebel News Plus – Become a Premium Content subscriber – https://rebelne.ws/plus
►BUY Rebel News gear – https://rebelne.ws/store
►LISTEN to our FREE podcast – https://rebelne.ws/podcast

Make sure to follow Rebel News on social media too!
RUMBLE – http://rebelne.ws/rumble
ODYSEE – https://odysee.com/@RebelNews:9
SUPERU – https://rebelne.ws/SuperU
FACEBOOK – https://rebelne.ws/fbook
TWITTER – https://rebelne.ws/twitter
INSTAGRAM – https://rebelne.ws/Instagram
TIKTOK – https://www.tiktok.com/@rebelnews
TELEGRAM – https://t.me/RealRebelNews

Subscribe to the “Rebel News Clips” channel on YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/c/RebelNewsClips

An original video production by Rebel News.

Quote

Face à Face | Claude Janvier : “un terrorisme viral” | FranceSoir

Tags

, , ,

Source: FranceSoir

Suivez le lien pour visioner l’entrevue: ======>Face à Face | Claude Janvier : “un terrorisme viral”<======

Ecrivain, polémiste, Claude Janvier est un homme d’esprit qui n’a pas sa langue dans sa poche.

Co-auteur du livre “Le virus et le Président: Enquête sur l’une des plus grandes tromperies de l’Histoireil répond aux questions de Richard Boutry, inaugurant notre nouveau format : Face à face.

Juste une capture d'écran: