And see these, too, from Prof Norman Fenton:
Norm’s note: an alternative but apt title to this post might have been, “When Ignorance Rules.”
Hat tip: HERE, and many thanks to Lee S Dryburgh.
“As someone who develops vaccines, I can tell you that it is difficult to make a vaccine that will perform as poorly as the current COVID-19 vaccines.”
– Byram W. Bridle, PhD, Associate Professor of Viral Immunology
In the unlikely event that Lee S Dryburgh’s Tweet disappears at the hands of the Twitter “fact checkers,” a more permanent link: AN OPEN LETTER TO THE PRESIDENT OF THE UNIVERSITY OF GUELPH
authoritarian measures, career threats, censorship of scientific papers and research, character assasination, manipulation, online search results manipulated, patient observations banned, politicization, profiteering
Source: Global Covid Summit
CONCERNED PHYSICIANS AND MEDICAL SCIENTISTS SEP 23, 2021
Read the Declaration HERE.
Over 4,200 physicians and medical scientists worldwide have signed the “Rome Declaration” to alert citizens about the deadly consequences of Covid-19 policy makers’ and medical authorities’ unprecedented behavior; behavior such as denying patient access to lifesaving early treatments, disrupting the sacred, physician-patient relationship and suppressing open scientific discussion for profits and power.
The Declaration was created by physicians and scientists during the Rome Covid Summit, and immediately catalyzed support from doctors around the world. These professionals, many of whom are on the front lines of pandemic treatment, have experienced career threats, character assassination, censorship of scientific papers and research, social media accounts blocked, online search results manipulated, clinical trials and patient observations banned, and their professional history and accomplishments minimized in both academic and mainstream media.
Though the declaration’s signatories are diverse in their specialties, treatment philosophies and medical opinions, they have risen up to take a collective stand against authoritarian measures by corporations, medical associations, and governments and their respective agencies. The objective of the declaration is to reclaim their leadership role in conquering this pandemic.
In concert with the declaration, the signatories have created a “Doctors – and Scientists-only” COVID information platform so that citizens can make informed decisions for their families without interruption, manipulation, politicization, or profiteering from external forces outside of the doctor-patient relationship.
Dr. Robert Malone, architect of the mRNA vaccine platform, reads the Rome Declaration:
We invite you to read the Declaration at the link above or by clicking HERE.
Under a Creative Commons license
This article examines issues related to COVID-19 inoculations for children. The bulk of the official COVID-19-attributed deaths per capita occur in the elderly with high comorbidities, and the COVID-19 attributed deaths per capita are negligible in children. The bulk of the normalized post-inoculation deaths also occur in the elderly with high comorbidities, while the normalized post-inoculation deaths are small, but not negligible, in children. Clinical trials for these inoculations were very short-term (a few months), had samples not representative of the total population, and for adolescents/children, had poor predictive power because of their small size. Further, the clinical trials did not address changes in biomarkers that could serve as early warning indicators of elevated predisposition to serious diseases. Most importantly, the clinical trials did not address long-term effects that, if serious, would be borne by children/adolescents for potentially decades.
A novel best-case scenario cost-benefit analysis showed very conservatively that there are five times the number of deaths attributable to each inoculation vs those attributable to COVID-19 in the most vulnerable 65+ demographic. The risk of death from COVID-19 decreases drastically as age decreases, and the longer-term effects of the inoculations on lower age groups will increase their risk-benefit ratio, perhaps substantially.
" a truly large-scale and still ongoing human tragedy", "analysis of what assholes refuse to analyze", "five times the number of deaths attributable to each inoculation", "mild cases of myocarditis", "risk of death from COVID-19 decreases drastically as age decreases", All-Cause Mortality, Dr. Ronald Kostoff, long term risk of the vaccines increases for lower age groups, Mathew Crawford, mortality rates of vaccinated vs those of unvaccinated, Professor Norman Fenton, where are the autopsies, Why are we vaccinating children against COVID-19
Source: Rounding the Earth Newsletter
By Mathew Crawford
September 24, 2021
“If you cannot show me a peer-reviewed paper published in a corrupt medical journal backing your calculations of vaccine-associated mortality, I’m going to have to assume that these mafia organizations are telling the whole truth about their vaccine products without reviewing their data, and accepting the 0 in the mortality column that hasn’t yet been studied.” -Jeffrey Morris (paraphrasing)
A new hero has emerged. Mostly-retired scientist Ronald Kostoff, PhD, and a highly experienced team, just had their paper published. The appropriate, if understated title of the paper is
Let us appreciate his restraint in never using the word “assholes” anywhere in the paper. At the age of 84, he maintains a level of polite discipline in the face of assholes I can scarcely muster on my better days.
Continue reading =====>Confirmation of Vaccine-Associated Mortality<=====
Readers have been asking what they can practically do or who they can turn to for help on this disturbing situation. In response, LifeSite has compiled information and links to organizations and legal resources to help Canadians resist vaccine mandates with a full understanding of their options.
Thu Sep 9, 2021 – 2:14 pm EDT
(LifeSiteNews) — Note: Please read the resources carefully before acting on any of them.
We have made this document available to download as a PDF here — How to resist COVID jab mandates in Canada — a comprehensive guide
Also, this is intended to be an open document that will be added to should we find or are advised of additional resources. If you have such information, whether it is for general use, or pertains to a specific profession, trade or group, please contact us here, and we will review and add to the list when confirmed.
Because of COVID vaccination mandates, numerous Canadians have become very concerned about losing freedoms, careers, jobs, education and more. Readers have been asking what they can practically do or who they can turn to for help on this disturbing situation.
In response, LifeSite has compiled information and links to organizations and legal resources to help Canadians resist vaccine mandates with a full understanding of their options.
It should also be noted that the Canadian situation is not the same as the American; we operate under different legal frameworks, thus it is important to utilize resources specific to your locale. Canadian provinces act differently than American states, and the different countries have different levels of application of authority from a federal level.
In some cases, unions are helping employees assert their rights, which is great, and if you have this option, then that is something to consider. In other cases, there is no express legal protection offered by a professional association, therefore a different approach is necessary.
It should provide Canadians with hope, however, that the question of mandated vaccination has come up before in various institutions, and Canadians have happily been validated in their rights. The COVID situation is unprecedented and of a massive scale, however the Law is still the Law. Know your rights and assert them boldly.
We are not advocating for any particular legal position but are instead offering a comprehensive resource of information that should prove to be helpful.
denial of access, experimental vaccines, infringement of Canadians’ constitutionally protected rights, legal warning letter, loss of ability to worship, loss of employment, medical coercion, Ontario, the right to informed conseent, the vaccine passport, two medical exemptions
POSTED ON: SEPTEMBER 22, 2021
TORONTO: The Justice Centre for Constitutional Freedoms has issued a legal warning letter to the Ontario Government on behalf of four clients demanding the vaccine passport mandate be revoked immediately. The law requires Ontarians as young as 12 to provide proof of two doses of the Covid mRNA vaccination as of September 22, 2021, or be denied access to a wide range of businesses and organizations, including field trips to city facilities. The Justice Centre has notified the Province that it will file a legal action should Ontario fail to halt its unconstitutional discrimination against those who have not yet chosen to receive the experimental vaccines.
Since the vaccine passport has been announced, the Justice Centre has received hundreds of emails from Ontarians concerned about loss of employment, loss of ability to worship, and denial of access to restaurants, bars, gyms, sporting events, meeting and event spaces, and more, unless they show proof of their confidential medical status of vaccination.
Ontario’s Ministry of Health has stated that the government will only recognize two medical exemptions for vaccine passports: one for those who are allergic to an ingredient in the vaccine, with verification provided by an allergist, and another for those who experienced myocarditis or pericarditis after the first dose of a vaccine. There has been no provision for exemptions based on religion and creed, both protected grounds under the Charter and Human Rights Act.
Covid mRNA vaccination shots are new, with no long-term safety profile, and clinical trials will not be complete until 2023. As such, the Covid shots are experimental. Canadians have the right to informed consent, and the right to be fully informed about the side effects of the Covid vaccine, which has known side effects. The vaccine manufacturers have stated there is no data on the vaccine’s effects on fertility, or their safety for pregnant women or children. Emerging data unequivocally establishes that the Delta variant spreads freely in the fully vaccinated population, and there are emerging links to miscarriages in pregnant women and a demonstrated risk of heart inflammation in teenage males.
On their face, vaccine passports are an infringement of Canadians’ constitutionally protected rights to freedom of conscience, the right to liberty and security of the person, and the right to be equal before the law. Based on these guarantees, every Canadian has the right to bodily autonomy and to decide what medical procedure to accept or reject. The demand letter asserts that mandatory vaccination for Covid constitutes a significant, unwarranted and profound infringement on the rights of Canadians that cannot be justified in a free and democratic society.
“Section 7 of the Charter guarantees the right to liberty and security of the person. Ontarians should not be coerced or pressured by the government into submitting to a medical intervention to which they do not consent. Informed consent and the right to bodily autonomy are two principles that our laws have long protected. It will be a tragedy to see Ontarians, including children, being coerced to take the vaccine, or else be socially marginalized,” says Jorge Pineda, Staff Lawyer at the Justice Centre.
Individuals who have not been vaccinated for a variety of reasons, including religious belief, creed, and medical issues or concerns over serious side effects, will effectively be segregated and marginalized. Their participation in society will become limited to what is deemed “essential” by the government.
“The new mandate will have the effect of segregating individuals and especially young children from mainstream society. Mandating a system that denies Canadian’s access to certain services that are arbitrarily defined as nonessential by the government creates a slippery slope, and sets a dangerous descent into a medical dictatorship,” notes Justice Centre staff lawyer Henna Parmar.
“If we do not put an end to these measures, we will be putting unlimited power in the hands of the government to dictate what medical care we receive, what drugs we take, and what privileges they will allow us that should be fundamental rights,” adds Ms. Parmar.
Hat tip: Dr. John B.
Source: The Journal of Headache and Pain
Open Access | Published: 17 September 2021
David García-Azorín, Thien Phu Do, Andreas R. Gantenbein, Jakob Møller Hansen, Marcio Nattan P. Souza, Mark Obermann, Heiko Pohl, Christoph J. Schankin, Henrik Winther Schytz, Alexandra Sinclair, Guus G. Schoonman & Espen Saxhaug Kristoffersen
The Journal of Headache and Pain volume 22, Article number: 108 (2021)
Headache is a frequent symptom following COVID-19 immunization with a typical onset within days post-vaccination. Cases of cerebral venous thrombosis (CVT) have been reported in adenovirus vector-based COVID-19 vaccine recipients.
We reviewed all vaccine related CVT published cases by April 30, 2021. We assessed demographic, clinical variables and the interval between the vaccination and onset of headache. We assessed whether the presence of headache was associated with higher probability of death or intracranial hemorrhage.
We identified 77 cases of CVT after COVID-19 vaccination. Patients’ age was below 60 years in 74/77 (95.8%) cases and 61/68 (89.7%) were women. Headache was described in 38/77 (49.4%) cases, and in 35/38 (92.1%) was associated with other symptoms. Multiple organ thrombosis was reported in 19/77 (24.7%) cases, intracranial hemorrhage in 33/77 (42.9%) cases and 19/77 (24.7%) patients died. The median time between vaccination and CVT-related headache onset was 8 (interquartile range 7.0–9.7) days. The presence of headache was associated with a higher odd of intracranial hemorrhage (OR 7.4; 95% CI: 2.7–20.8, p < 0.001), but not with death (OR: 0.51, 95% CI: 0.18–1.47, p = 0.213).
Delayed onset of headache following an adenovirus vector-based COVID-19 vaccine is associated with development of CVT. Patients with new-onset headache, 1 week after vaccination with an adenovirus vector-based vaccine, should receive a thorough clinical evaluation and CVT must be ruled out.
"lymphocytic-predominance", 10 autopsies, 8 evaluations, deaths associated with Corona vaccinations, difficulty of detection, epicarditis, lymphocytic myocarditis, pathological institute in Reutlingen, pericarditis, the necessity of histological analysis
Norm’s note: a short article nicely summarizing the presser: ‘Lymphocyte riot’: Pathologists investigate deaths after Corona vaccination
Anyone who followed the press conference of German pathology professors Arne Burkhardt and Walter Lang must be wondering how long the Covid-19 vaccines will still be on the market. The autopsy of ten people who died after Corona vaccinations speak for themselves.
(1/n) Today there was a press conference from the pathological institute in Reutlingen, Germany. The pathologists Prof. Dr. Arne Burkhardt and Prof. Dr. Walter presented the results of the autopsies of eight people who died after COVID19 vaccination.
(2/n) In addition, new microscopic analyses of an Austrian research group on the ingredients of the vaccines were presented.
Video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NIjcEoWjzT0 (in German)
Here is a summary of the highlights.
(3/n) 10 autopsies, 8 evaluations.
(Slide text translated into English)
(Slide text translated into English)
(5/n) Key findings.
(Slide text translated into English)
(6/n) Tissue with lymphocytic infiltration.
(Blue dots: lymphocytes). The tissue is inflamed.
By Jeanne Smits, Paris correspondent
According to the CTIAP, all of the vaccines were put on the market and actively used on human beings before ‘proof of quality for the active substance and the finished product’ was produced.
Thu Apr 22, 2021 – 10:42 am EDT
April 22, 2021 (LifeSiteNews) — A regional independent drug assessment center, the CTIAP (Centre territorial d’Information indépendante et d’Avis pharmaceutiques), which is linked to the Cholet public hospital in the west of France, recently published a report showing that the vaccines used against COVID were not only submitted to insufficient clinical testing, but that the quality of the active substances, their “excipients, some of which are new,” and the manufacturing processes are problematic. “These new excipients should be considered as new active substances,” the Cholet hospital team stated, in a study that according to them raises issues that have not been commented to date.
The team led by Dr. Catherine Frade, a pharmacist, worked on public data released by the EMA with relation to the Pfizer, Moderna, AstraZeneca and Janssen (Johnson & Johnson) shots, and its first caveat was that all these products only have temporary marketing authorizations. They are all subject to further studies that reach as far as 2024 and even beyond, and these will be almost impossible to be completed because of the way the vaccines are now being distributed, said the CTIAP report.
These studies even include the stability and comparability of the vaccine batches put on the market and the quality and safety of excipients — substances formulated alongside the active ingredient of a medication to facilitate or enhance their absorption.
According to the CTIAP, all of the vaccines were put on the market and actively used on human beings before “proof of quality for the active substance and the finished product” was produced: all the manufacturing labs obtained future deadlines to submit their studies in this regard.
The authors of the report consider that the “variabilities, which impact the very core of the product, could even invalidate any clinical trials conducted” in the coming months and years.
They go so far as to state: “Prudence would even dictate that, in all countries where these vaccines against COVID-19 have been marketed, all the batches thus ‘released’ should be withdrawn immediately; and that these MAs that have been granted should be suspended, or even canceled, as a matter of urgency until further notice.”
Source: COVEXIT: COVID-19 NEWS & POLICY ANALYSIS
This interview with Jessica Rose, PhD, covers the question of vaccine safety, as it can be evaluated from actual real world data collected into the so called “VAERS” system. The interview covers the question of the magnitude of adverse effects, as compared to previous vaccination programs; the issue of under-reporting, which is considerable; the question of causality between an adverse event and an injection and the extent to which causality can be established, using the Bradford Hill Criteria. There is also a discussion of effectiveness, with Dr Rose answering the somewhat rhetorical question whether these injections are as effective as they are safe. Dr Rose then answers some questions from the audience.
The interview is available as a podcast and as a video. The podcast version is a bit longer as it includes introductory remarks by JP Kiekens.
The slides associated with the session can be downloaded at this link.
Source: Doctors for COVID Ethics
What happens inside your body after injection with gene-based COVID-19 vaccines? How does this new ‘vaccination’ technology differ from usual vaccination methods, and why is that dangerous?
What causes blood clots after vaccination? How common is that likely to be, and is it really true that COVID-19 vaccination can cause blood vessels to leak? If so, what does that mean for the safety of booster shots?
In this document, we answer all those questions, based on the latest and best available science. We explain how several papers in 2021 significantly advanced our understanding of SARS-CoV-2 immunity, and therefore the science and safety of COVID-19 vaccines.
Unfortunately, as the COVID-19 vaccination programme has followed a policy of ‘vaccinate first – research later’, our understanding of SARS-CoV-2 immunity has only recently caught up with the rushed vaccination schedule.
Given that no clinical trials involved more than two injections of any vaccine, it is important that doctors and patients understand where the latest science leaves us in terms of how the vaccines interact with the immune system, and the implications for booster shots.
We explain here that booster shots are uniquely dangerous, in a way that is unprecedented in the history of vaccines. That is because repeatedly boosting the immune response will repeatedly boost the intensity of self-to-self attack.
Please take the time to read this important information, and share.
The findings are presented in summary form for those who would like an overview, followed by an explanation of the underlying immunology for those who wish to understand in more detail.
1108% (one thousand and one hundred and eight percent) increase in adverse events, a typical timeline of vaccine development, accelerated timeline of vaccine development, adverse events, backlog, exclusion criteria, no safety data on lactating women, no safety data on pregnant women, underreporting, Vaccines, VAERS, what is the cut off in deaths for terminating these vaccines?
Hat tip: Stephanie Seneff
Hello all! Welcome to the long-awaited VAERS update! This update is for VAERS data from the August 27th update and covers all sorts of goodies! Like total counts, missing data, lost safety signals, escape mutants and more! The presentation was officially made for the Canadian COVID Care Alliance and is sectioned according to Safety and Efficacy. I really hope you like it!
If you do like it and want to support me, please make a small donation to the Joshua Kuntz Fellowship. All donations go directly to me to fund this research. We honor Joshua’s life and his passing with this Fellowship in our fight to bring science and truth to light in dark times.
Please go to: https://ipaknowledge.org/joshua-kuntz…
Also, if you want to know more about me or my work, please visit my website: https://i-do-not-consent.netlify.app
Not to insinuate anything, but this is interesting, eh:
Data from Public Health England (PHE) shows that during that period there were 2,103 extra death registrations with ischemic heart disease, 1,552 with heart failure, as well as an extra 760 deaths with cerebrovascular diseases such as stroke and aneurysm and 3,915 with other circulatory diseases.
Source: Free West Media Norway reclassifies Covid-19: No more dangerous than ordinary flu Covid-19 is treated in the mass media …
Norm’s note: I await Councillor Gower’s reply if he ever does. One can always hope. 22 September 2021 Dear Councillor …
Source: Health Advisory & Recovery Team Chris Whitty ignores JCVI advice September 16, 2021 12-15 year olds now offered COVID-19 …
Hat tip: Mathew Crawford ==>Estimating Vaccine-Induced Mortality, Part 6: Hawaii in Isolation | Rounding The Earth Newsletter Source: The False …
Hat tip: Robert W Malone, MD
Related: US COVID-19 Vaccines Proven to Cause More Harm than Good Based on Pivotal Clinical Trial Data Analyzed Using the …